Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless

Keith Mitchell <keith@dns-oarc.net> Thu, 08 August 2013 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <keith@dns-oarc.net>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478BE11E812A for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shZupVX5M59X for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dns-oarc.net (in1.dns-oarc.net [149.20.58.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6DA21F99C2 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [91.207.198.3] (rrcs-70-61-238-78.central.biz.rr.com [70.61.238.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dns-oarc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C74E6BDCFB; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keith@dns-oarc.net)
Message-ID: <5203A697.10705@dns-oarc.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:09:27 -0400
From: Keith Mitchell <keith@dns-oarc.net>
Organization: DNS-OARC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308050439080.146@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <EB27A179-6515-43BE-B17B-2B853791788E@kumari.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308080755220.5289@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308080755220.5289@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:09:39 -0000

On 08/08/2013 01:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

>>> Check out the NOC report which was referenced (but not
>>> delivered) during the plenary on Wednesday.
> 
> Scary how many are using the unencrypted wifi.

Probably I'm being dumb, but I find it too much hassle to configure for
Linux - my network config tool (knetworkmanager *) always asks for more
WPA/802.1x parameter options than are ever published. I could probably
be less lazy and figure them out or ask around, but a sample config or
template file would sure help.

Not that I don't use SSH. Seems to work just great for Android.

Keith

(*) you can take your own view whether this is a developer UI fail or a
protocol feature overload fail...