Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 21 July 2016 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F58B12D0C2; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJkIzkz28aHa; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83FC112D131; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6LCcLnC030706; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:38:21 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (jplon-nat14.juniper.net [193.110.55.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6LCcK5B030695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:38:21 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Robert Sparks' <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, ietf@ietf.org, 96attendees@ietf.org
References: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:38:21 +0100
Message-ID: <074701d1e34c$c4f49d00$4eddd700$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHQ3ct3SqdAtWAw73Laf2WWuKpeAKAk3aZw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22464.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.989-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.989-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: cgbqQT5W8hdjDV//SvkH3qVzYsvffdUx4oY5nPT1cB40C8Dp8kkTtY4m akWSIXbD0gDUFsLddA2e13MG4y1Z243mgF0zSpmjj5hLPCX3ZdMuFjL0BGSgF5hOY3ZzHC1Jisj Q+aCqjaRzHL0Yxdimu2liZO8Cga46QpjkZW1zh69rDUnWABcnUmC05M57wtm/myiLZetSf8nJ4y 0wP1A6APkvV+z371TK5MIx11wv+COujVRFkkVsm7zr44/LYj8W5xmsl00y/jAtZP0wAq1/Ukx1P mJNef/y5ULOPShoFu7fZ90P9hPf/iPXz9Wrg90rPcmNpxduKFqPEh39IuNgTzYWjgR8c2pdjkwk p0U3oPoj1SFBi5SOJ0bdNWawWa9+eXpC4wGnh8Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/-PrIy7epIoLMWuEcM5_vSC0yD4M>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:38:27 -0000

Please quantify expense.
Please compare with cost of printing on site.
I may offer personal sponsorship.
Adrian

> I am becoming convinced that the small pre-printed folded agendas are
> doing more harm than good.
> 
> We've become more dynamic with meeting scheduling - the pre-printed
> agendas are almost always incorrect at the start of the meeting.
> 
> We have much better online tools, including smartphone apps that provide
> better access to non-stale data.
> 
> We've found it easy to have printers on-site for anyone who really needs
> to print a copy (and can post instructions in an easy to find place on
> how to make that happen).
> 
> Therefore, I would propose that the secretariat be directed to not
> provide the folded agendas in Seoul, so that we eliminate the printing
> and shipping expense (and associated environmental impact).
> 
> RjS