IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Thu, 21 July 2016 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC1E12D928; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WaIrz4zafhmd; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2F012D97D; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u6LCwUkw003270; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:58:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201607211258.u6LCwUkw003270@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:31:09 +0200. <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:58:30 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/lyhs5CpnVwffI_v9Ig8sE2N1hL8>
Cc: 96attendees@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:00:04 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

=> I have to disagree: I find them really useful and they don't
require a working network connection to be used...

>  We've found it easy to have printers on-site for anyone who really needs 
>  to print a copy (and can post instructions in an easy to find place on 
>  how to make that happen).

=> I am not against if these printers provide an agenda at the same size
and fold it...

>  Therefore, I would propose that the secretariat be directed to not 
>  provide the folded agendas in Seoul, so that we eliminate the printing 
>  and shipping expense (and associated environmental impact).

=> I believe the secretariat already limited the number of printed
mini-agendas and I am sure they are given only on explicit demand
(versus to everyboday as it wa done some years ago).

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email