Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 21 July 2016 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E2212DA22; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gc9aZ5ronpPR; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5205512DA1F; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.60.47] (dhcp-b17d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.177.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u6LCjjIT093409 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:45:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host dhcp-b17d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.177.125] claimed to be [10.47.60.47]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:45:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CF2EEFFE-6794-4188-92BF-8A50B02D25C3@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com>
References: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/z7VP0L_1YasgrEdLeFxw1j0RgMI>
Cc: 96attendees@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:45:51 -0000

On 21 Jul 2016, at 14:31, Robert Sparks wrote:

> We've become more dynamic with meeting scheduling - the pre-printed 
> agendas are almost always incorrect at the start of the meeting.

Fully agree, but:

> We have much better online tools, including smartphone apps that 
> provide better access to non-stale data.

The smartphone apps that we have today still don't work well at all. 
Until they improve, the choice is opening up a laptop every time or 
using a small object I can look at (squinting hard, of course).

> We've found it easy to have printers on-site for anyone who really 
> needs to print a copy (and can post instructions in an easy to find 
> place on how to make that happen).

If we had an agenda template that worked for the printer *and* the 
printer printed fine enough (which I doubt for our current color inkjet 
printers), that would be a good alternative.

> Therefore, I would propose that the secretariat be directed to not 
> provide the folded agendas in Seoul, so that we eliminate the printing 
> and shipping expense (and associated environmental impact).

1) Please only do this if the app works much more reliably than it does 
now.

2) Is the cost really that large? This is about two reams of paper, yes?

--Paul Hoffman