IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C7F12D0B4; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btg-I_9i55ar; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C6D12D149; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b199so60968181lfe.0; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Br6OhuiG2oN7XebDCRuDZEw6ZvOGkdt6aWI5qyzs9QY=; b=evlxlrH7VqKluAdHeG8lAGCgls6JzkThfPbFiPL0jjc3+VDe8C8cqsceuZjFROls6+ h8VdKUCXI1nSFg9Os1RiVwV985ICRDDKd2hnLiPJo2Omsl0A/0M5ypEC40VZAwY1ZyCb s4vRqO8BsCPSCw3jN5uEXMnCkH++ceEYbNzzZo60Gbtld1Ho2i17rqFj96qZVB4nsBD4 Bb9ZVg06fBFMX7x6nhq87anpqgN+IT9A8KPQNXWczVpCdgKEzc8Eq+8OLOrMp9dvz32M 7KDng5qtQKJD6kQ3ov1moITbX/aSaHpT8/B4y+Rb03QHMtqYxVYRvNaA8zB0DXqAKm16 TOYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Br6OhuiG2oN7XebDCRuDZEw6ZvOGkdt6aWI5qyzs9QY=; b=M0Xouytx8MwyrWDpXRmCZ4KgoHCWTdj8fSRsdTd3t3mRhAqPd5r1Fd0N6rciP+8u41 bvEoEleNeKWEhPQC5uOIYosUkci30LMZZ/+NBFJ8piYw5I1MAx/4HDBlrEzaELbNLMFp 8XDUrOEukRyf/h3i/27H5X9tWwZMZWOwcj48e0tw4BLBB0nsLEWgM4P7sPoNA3uZuvOs 26MpoZR4KJP/fnOzIdU/WQY36n4BB/7ABV1eNp30RuEYbeyOs+rTo0llJqubTlMNdyfw MWmMv5n28aMatNWDkqSSlV4GQme1+elotjBNjugckTEkTCufPVoq+hsmjo0XXzcLh+mX Sufw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKVn0QK0IoWu9nghWuB9K8eBsCJ1N3E8Du+/gjwz/MiwZ7LUu5cJBZf1FhEViCU3g==
X-Received: by 10.25.80.84 with SMTP id e81mr10867077lfb.96.1469105092183; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2001:67c:370:160:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f40sm1726493lji.46.2016.07.21.05.44.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Robert Sparks' <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, ietf@ietf.org, 96attendees@ietf.org
References: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com> <074701d1e34c$c4f49d00$4eddd700$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <2fb3b52a-1bf1-79de-1533-4dbca4d45703@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:44:58 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <074701d1e34c$c4f49d00$4eddd700$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/a6A6BRhvmyeSvm9oyklsyHF8TMo>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:44:57 -0000

Also, and absolutely without ignoring smartphones, what I have used
the mini-agenda for is above all the room plan.

Regards
   Brian
On 22/07/2016 00:38, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Please quantify expense.
> Please compare with cost of printing on site.
> I may offer personal sponsorship.
> Adrian
> 
>> I am becoming convinced that the small pre-printed folded agendas are
>> doing more harm than good.
>>
>> We've become more dynamic with meeting scheduling - the pre-printed
>> agendas are almost always incorrect at the start of the meeting.
>>
>> We have much better online tools, including smartphone apps that provide
>> better access to non-stale data.
>>
>> We've found it easy to have printers on-site for anyone who really needs
>> to print a copy (and can post instructions in an easy to find place on
>> how to make that happen).
>>
>> Therefore, I would propose that the secretariat be directed to not
>> provide the folded agendas in Seoul, so that we eliminate the printing
>> and shipping expense (and associated environmental impact).
>>
>> RjS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 96attendees mailing list
> 96attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email