Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

Oliver Hahm <oliver.hahm@inria.fr> Thu, 21 July 2016 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <oliver.hahm@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683C712D1AC; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eL2TYolbOcnV; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.stillroot.org (mail.stillroot.org [176.9.132.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7553B12D098; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stillroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E812A4202F; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ba.stillroot.org
Received: from mail.stillroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.stillroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9lOiEUV02SZP; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:31:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hobbykeller.org (dhcp-b132.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.177.50]) by mail.stillroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB89D4202E; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:31:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:30:48 +0200
From: Oliver Hahm <oliver.hahm@inria.fr>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Message-ID: <20160721133047.GA11213@hobbykeller.org>
References: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com> <201607211258.u6LCwUkw003270@givry.fdupont.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201607211258.u6LCwUkw003270@givry.fdupont.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/MxN9w15VAeoCDBqlPjtGmKZvPwQ>
Cc: 96attendees@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:31:59 -0000

Hi!

> >  Therefore, I would propose that the secretariat be directed to not 
> >  provide the folded agendas in Seoul, so that we eliminate the printing 
> >  and shipping expense (and associated environmental impact).
> 
> => I believe the secretariat already limited the number of printed
> mini-agendas and I am sure they are given only on explicit demand
> (versus to everyboday as it wa done some years ago).

Yes, that's what is happening and I think it is a very good approach. There
are people without smart phones (or phones that doesn't support appstores for
various reasons). Also, lookup time on the paper agenda is always O(1) which
is a clear advantage for me.

Cheers,
Oleg