IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 12 April 2019 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF10A120145 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RF2O0LwyFR7a for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A45471200EF for <add@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E8AB20B0A; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, add@ietf.org
References: <297C80CE-F017-4F4A-80E2-79941E8B9E02@icann.org> <b64761dc-dfab-e4e1-4bfb-82d607efa590@riseup.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904101324530.9940@bofh.nohats.ca> <64aeff58-6d68-4c4f-b991-2b2f62d193a0@www.fastmail.com> <90A5C5C4-373C-4B39-80C2-C115CD23CB4D@fl1ger.de> <994839978.18707.1554973716877@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <af5f5c76-0095-65a0-39d1-d29d4bb0e906@mozilla.com> <ybl36mn8b54.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <f9d0cd98-db0c-7f42-d351-d9a5002c4765@mozilla.com> <CA+9kkMAobw2giYO=8pbLVi4ms0Ru+nYwhV5DGxLCwaUdX6EQyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:38:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMAobw2giYO=8pbLVi4ms0Ru+nYwhV5DGxLCwaUdX6EQyQ@mail.gmail.com> (Ted Hardie's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:54:35 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblv9zj5591.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/6Uki-91Ad3UZu5RZ9iKerL4aMqo>
Subject: Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:38:05 -0000

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> writes:

> So, I assume Wes didn't mean sending all queries to all entities on
> the list,

That would defeat the purpose of what I was saying, so yes...  I meant
rotate through them.

> What this should do is associate the clients with the lowest latency
> resolver.

I wish we (collectively) could get over the notion that latency was the
only, or the most important metric out there at all times.
Happy-eyeballs approaches to problems can go too far.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email