IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Sat, 13 April 2019 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9255120092 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lZIHToYWQXR for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A14AF120043 for <add@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13BA36A264; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:11:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1555143089; bh=5HsxfdU0YSkpeJdivT2FPU5RWDoWVtRfyl57VWc/2wY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=ZhswvN6vf9VrtK8ShdyvNn+2v2OhWjPSoIggencF3hh/++2kVQ7YhUDt/UBcylec7 KKs6fXGz9NppZ6t8ydI8j7UrShd/thbfHt1wANdilYqhBRyhqf5LIx6u7Q4sknSIgz eWIYfZiK6d4GYRspvFo1K3WBPYqHYByS3YhgCZsROlArx3qxTRM70D8txHcXOtCCfE cuXsGg0LXpBtQAfz1hGmoYHOoh2hhxhMiYGd2fVGEl04gQ+gT2uXj26iB5OH6aq69y HIeXZZpHj9zAluaqYGX01ysP13P5sIEeUwopT/cu2DV5zMmCXLjpjouXNGtWJLNbL0 lddMgcx5xPSTw==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8A813C036E; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:11:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:11:28 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
Cc: add@ietf.org
Message-ID: <544663959.23797.1555143088877@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <f9d0cd98-db0c-7f42-d351-d9a5002c4765@mozilla.com>
References: <297C80CE-F017-4F4A-80E2-79941E8B9E02@icann.org> <b64761dc-dfab-e4e1-4bfb-82d607efa590@riseup.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904101324530.9940@bofh.nohats.ca> <64aeff58-6d68-4c4f-b991-2b2f62d193a0@www.fastmail.com> <90A5C5C4-373C-4B39-80C2-C115CD23CB4D@fl1ger.de> <994839978.18707.1554973716877@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <af5f5c76-0095-65a0-39d1-d29d4bb0e906@mozilla.com> <ybl36mn8b54.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <f9d0cd98-db0c-7f42-d351-d9a5002c4765@mozilla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev10
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/jmxo2zU8G2mI0SusOwK4AnAHAoQ>
Subject: Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:11:33 -0000

> Il 12 aprile 2019 alle 19.14 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> ha scritto:
> 
> Personally I don't know that most users have a "point of view" regarding
> centralization. Definitions might vary, but in my experience many people
> think centralization occurs when a given kind of service is provided by
> only one or a few entities. If we can build an ecosystem wherein there
> are dozens of DoH providers, is that centralization?

It is still centralization if there is a single entity deciding who can run an "accredited" DoH provider, i.e. one that will be actually part of the available choices / rotation set / default for most users. If there can be no other way than having a single entity (or a few entities) doing something for everyone, then you need to get into the realm of building organizational and regulatory machinery that guarantees the public interest (ICANN anyone?). And this is hard and always controversial.

Ciao,
-- 

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email