Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

On 4/19/19 14:02, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Add <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Adam Roach
>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 11:42 AM
>> To: Vladimír Čunát <[e-mail]>; Ralf Weber
>> <[e-mail]>; Daniel Stenberg <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: [e-mail]
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Add] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy
>>
>> On 4/11/19 10:18 AM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>>> If Firefox is to be taken mainly as a real-life example on this
>>> mailing-list, is there a suitable Firefox-specific place to discuss
>>> related issues? (Assuming Mozilla is actually interested in that.)
>>>
>> Of course your input is welcome. Mozilla is an opensource project, and
>> everyone is invited to participate.
>>
>> For implementation discussions, DoH is part of our networking stack, called
>> Necko. Those are discussed on
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mozilla.dev.tech.network
>>
>> For privacy-related discussions, use
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mozilla.dev.privacy
> Adam, would discussion of the operational aspects of the TRR program (things like "this is what's expected of participating resolvers") be appropriate for this list or one of the lists described above?


Speaking only for myself [and not in any official role] --

My suggestion would be that you decide what you're trying to accomplish 
and post to one or the other accordingly. If you want to have a 
conversation with other Mozilla contributors about the specific TRR 
policy that Mozilla has adopted, I'd use a Mozilla mailing list. If you 
want to provide input to something that you see the IETF eventually 
publishing, I'd post it here. In the latter case, I would imagine you'd 
talk in more general terms about operational guidance for all 
applications, rather than focusing on suggestions for a single product: 
the chances that the IETF publishes a document that focuses on guidance 
for a single product are vanishingly small.

/a