Re: [Add] [Ext] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 12 April 2019 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A899120369 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T2oZKd91WuZc for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D31120052 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x3C26aC6044661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:06:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1555034798; bh=MT8XhgelHrQaZJj+Y/JKiBh3iGmLnYfn5Joo6WxInjA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=H1qXGFzBqwMNrGjSg0o8gWfPhx9Z4ko6d7LmpGzQwJeJFFwZ8bboAc2SfnpcaHspu zBnGSi6wjZ7qxk/UYbpYXhFMjsWttuocxeneaibRKHx2yn0Nqvj06JhVt7HHnHLkLn p91UCXJXEcdrUapsYRNYcxTIUk765+N5ubO1aF60=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>, "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
References: <297C80CE-F017-4F4A-80E2-79941E8B9E02@icann.org> <b64761dc-dfab-e4e1-4bfb-82d607efa590@riseup.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904101324530.9940@bofh.nohats.ca> <64aeff58-6d68-4c4f-b991-2b2f62d193a0@www.fastmail.com> <90A5C5C4-373C-4B39-80C2-C115CD23CB4D@fl1ger.de> <CACQYfiJa1i2LVgQDcHi_OknmDDKZiaw=++Y6imn34LcPULP3bQ@mail.gmail.com> <E0CA1520-74D4-4A41-9B44-10946FAB4534@fl1ger.de> <CACQYfiKeh=FgmB9RN=eJ-2tq4jyTg55fep4au9SeGe3U5VkMBQ@mail.gmail.com> <ED802588-CD5D-4F80-914D-CA25EE234424@fl1ger.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904111144200.31156@tvnag.unkk.fr> <792D4346-DE43-4BFC-85D4-FC58366E38B5@fl1ger.de> <945967b1-581f-e603-49f1-b9f173decb39@nic.cz> <6c11589f-fb00-e15d-9c16-a22368351c50@mozilla.com> <1A4EBCEB-4779-4407-90D5-D1733E0BB9F8@icann.org> <5bb4970e-376d-44e8-95cc-0040bc2eac4d@nostrum.com> <CAH1iCipE7e_zoAZew6HNGaC8k6sgK2vnmmvtcK+m4cDVpL2Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <15e8ab14-44a3-33a4-8f1b-8e3c18739c00@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:06:31 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCipE7e_zoAZew6HNGaC8k6sgK2vnmmvtcK+m4cDVpL2Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A005F776C20407CC8FCE5C35"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/d0CRR3inMDeJd9mdIu2r31L_EM8>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Mozilla's DoH resolver policy
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 02:07:03 -0000

On 4/11/19 7:24 PM, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:51 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 4/11/19 3:34 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>     > On Apr 11, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Peter Saint-Andre
>     <stpeter@mozilla.com <mailto:stpeter@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>     >>> If Firefox is to be taken mainly as a real-life example on this
>     >>> mailing-list, is there a suitable Firefox-specific place to
>     discuss
>     >>> related issues?
>     >> The Networking:DNS component is the one to watch:
>     >>
>     >>
>     https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Core&component=Networking%3A%20DNS&bug_status=__open__&list_id=14662850
>     >>
>     >> We don't (yet) have a discussion list for "Firefox Doing DNS".
>     >>
>     >>> (Assuming Mozilla is actually interested in that.)
>     >> Feedback is always welcome. :-)
>     > Do you mean "feedback on the ADD list" or "feeback in the
>     Bugzilla tracker" or both?
>     >
>     > --Paul Hoffman
>
>
>     I think we'd like to prevent the "Applications Doing DNS" list from
>     becoming just the "Mozilla Doing DNS" list. To the extent that you'd
>     like to engage with a broader slice of Mozilla than just those of
>     us who
>     participate in the IETF, I'd encourage you to take Mozilla-specific
>     concerns to the mailing lists I pointed to earlier.
>
>
> Hmm...
>
> I disagree on multiple distinct fronts.



I'll repeat the most important words from my previous message, as your 
response indicates that you skipped over them: "To the extent that you'd 
like to engage with a broader slice of Mozilla than just those of us who
participate in the IETF..."

/a