IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to you (was: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?)

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Mon, 17 February 2014 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D481A03F6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mK3EgDcbYYmU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57991A00B4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fp1so14808957pdb.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=l0xS71mPNraZBCAZJjyubWFUrAn6QL3Xsp0IkccmRTQ=; b=BaobMWjeX6KTqbEZm/9YKLJU8V3peszQ5NDtiJDJbgaJn1lb2sHpjBWeTuULjOOly+ 0lsvG19nCs3dn2uRkuMRE9pmG2fHNCndsLOfjuwesOSr6k3jC4cKKFaNzFjpTK47lK9K 5a79eyHKi7pLHUJasjLQDMVyXYxzjZUibtaN1EqgoIM3YiI73bLcIsHkh8mZwVan90hW aIHd0u74BzQq4bhJnKVlFK1BKOAg5e3X97kgHU4E7FJfx6GjManScfd3zphkU3XgZKgR +3Z43ZgoyTOFDclTo9chCazhFd/kAMVqLIiokda8n/rsd+RknQjvZnyvA/fALgyaY4rE tnIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrftQCboLrvEp9EqKo8gnHIAbjiWyS4XYbC887zhPqNPTsB1babxpJjPHrJKoebsn58miV
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.202.8 with SMTP id ke8mr27857787pbc.86.1392657751267; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.143.4 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [108.45.162.177]
In-Reply-To: <0DB8F884-5E50-4DA2-AD0B-C07EBB2C8F47@vpnc.org>
References: <20140216035539.2686.qmail@joyce.lan> <53009C37.3030009@ninebynine.org> <0DB8F884-5E50-4DA2-AD0B-C07EBB2C8F47@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:22:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRcWGUzQraHY0OZb5KaOR_KT=Lo81u2PXVTKoF0qRvjFxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/CwB4jxXgSP8bbObAljW2hAXy5qc
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to you (was: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:22:35 -0000

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> There is clearly a question of whether the WEIRDS WG will be allowed to use their current approach or be forced to change to templates. That question cannot be answered by more messages on this mailing list.
>

I think you have incorrectly framed the issue and resolution. The
issue is if the WEIRDS WG is specifying a protocol with URI
collisions. If they are, one of possible resolutions is to use URI
templates.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email