Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Sun, 16 February 2014 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283791A01E2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDo_gOIkNJqZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811F31A01E1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fp1so13477847pdb.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m2jyoe/zV6MxZApBBd49QrJr1WsP9pE0xnz9aIgaMx4=; b=Vkfoc5/0V/4j/7qzvPV21UtOextnedriLGLpVzExZZr+dnHP+4sXky2QhB9ohaV+9C UfG3/XMW0fG9gkp3vjyPHgh1oHsdMOGE95d/eABj3kG//EGP9++vMs7kTxXRDVMSR++W ajg0siVBHU9+MtOAKhYfAgUEVA7I+MyzF72CsBLH+7I5tyoW4DC8kF5QeHhbC/kcnHCT gjrnb2RKEI18kOubvFmGHHJVfY7yr3Sdbue8Fb3S5PK28lI3WsFPriCkEIkQ/ifjiuSb u0iAMZ+iKMQnAvIfy5JeY8qiMWftttK5d3O82MZqtGnmgRfelw0lPFUl7oG7oayuRm0x PXlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQloeHLGvzN5vM6tU8CjVr9Np449s4jygjfu9VtNj/p/nzRmT3gwLJohPoMuR1Ff4RKSQWHf
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.164.165 with SMTP id yr5mr20248368pab.63.1392556298310; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.143.4 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 05:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.11]
In-Reply-To: <CAKioOqv8kq_FwoFEMLMejqKAAo=_hFZiE4B9K4RscEBVcU_vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKioOqv8kq_FwoFEMLMejqKAAo=_hFZiE4B9K4RscEBVcU_vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:11:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRdXPx8+hsU7x16brrsCg0qUyG9fMwa91Pw3_d_YbKf2Jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: darrel@tavis.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/jULoXfQdyMAGWw62jytejU43sMc
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:11:42 -0000

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Darrel Miller <darrel.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an example, this URL,
> http://example.com/.well-known/rdap/ip/192.0.2.0/24 would be pain for
> a few of the frameworks that I am familiar with as it is not possible
> to have a slash as part of a parameter value.  Creating a routing that
> would handle both the IP and CIDR parameters would be tricky.

And yet there are some methods/frameworks that would have a problem
doing as you suggest as well, so it's a tradeoff. As it stands, all
RDAP lookups can be laid down on a file system. Your suggestion would
remove that.

> Now all you need is a single .well-known name, such as,
> http://example.com/.well-known/rdap/home that could return something
> like this application/home+json document,

[..snip..]

I believe this is where Mark was going with the bootstrapping. It's
worth exploring at that layer as it is more useful there than with
.well-known.

Thanks.

-andy