Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Thu, 13 February 2014 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FA11A014F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:24:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRECNPCsCpxM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83B21A017C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C470FA0078; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:24:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1392279851-18442-18441/11/10; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:24:11 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:24:17 +0100
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.3.96-176-g713fcbb; Qt/4.8.4; X11; Linux; Ubuntu 13.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <d78c1e0b-fa92-4ac4-8ade-38f584923c12@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <52FC309F.3000504@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <20140211223250.68983.qmail@joyce.lan> <B1C114F7-5FA4-49F7-880F-9E94FCB24BFA@mnot.net> <CAHBU6ituZwwpu0LNHNK0R=XXY1Y88ovgu+THEPBf49sORaP0_A@mail.gmail.com> <52FC309F.3000504@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:24:17 -0000

I don't understand this.

AFAICT, IANA is serving basically a giant discovery response pointing to 
lookup URLs. Why would the IANA registry have to contain only foo/rdap/ip 
for IPv4 lookups? I don't see why the lookups have to be constrained.

To look up AS31337, I retrieve the discovery response, usually from cache, 
and look up the right <link rel> in the xml. Then I ask that URL. Sounds 
good.

There are details I don't like. The draft indicates that I should take the 
URL I found in the IANA thing, append / and then my argument. Why isn't the 
slash already on the URL I found? And what escaping rules apply to my 
argument?

Arnt