IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 09 March 2012 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBDB21F85F4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:18:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.922, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YhyuAZsOy081 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FA921F865C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 54922 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2012 14:18:09 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Mar 2012 14:18:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f5a1121.xn--yuvv84g.k1203; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=iedr+kDhHt1uuAHaKI+2qF0SDx7rZ/4nt3ulP0FhGUs=; b=BxGQZUXuZdlv4P/ZWy3l34me448/nR/UdAJ7mkusbQthiSBwwKLeBhZ8P/BiPClqvCr7zF2l7/W6JBwJGtagsdu5E+kzDZPezEZxcZVohbB45OvmRy3It8yCjx9W9jSidS5mjzNpuFJQhbiKP8Jzxq7kRLhospr3yofd47TXmEk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f5a1121.xn--yuvv84g.k1203; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=iedr+kDhHt1uuAHaKI+2qF0SDx7rZ/4nt3ulP0FhGUs=; b=nvGVBT+/3Pc6NODPAcuSea/45cnxt0rb7t2jJOU/0nygo+a+FFJXh65X8BrJAOB/D7cu7gq8BDtfXGA6aTF1pkDEeFXW/jpRRvtdh+p5Ju9Clvn/7WhIhSQ2nn93cqdviQOtsb8AaQyNT/ADpCEJSgPfflezqPogTELLCp8moiQ=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:17:47 -0000
Message-ID: <20120309141747.82205.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CACwuEiOa8tMoyf8eAHGqEU_JKE+Rizv0i+SxoSBOBpUw9iHvuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:18:24 -0000

>>  Anyone likely to implement it?  The IETF has a well known
>> preference for running code.
>
>(One might wonder if such conflicts with the 'come with a problem
>rather than a solution' philosophy of the BOFs / mailing list
>proposals @ http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434#page-2 ?  Then again,
>one might try to focus on avoiding bureaucratic discussion
>entirely...)

I'll take that as "no".

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email