IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-discuss] Running code ...

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Fri, 09 March 2012 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854A421F84DF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:23:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ztbtFEAMfB6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BA221F84DC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5099820E40FA; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:23:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1331303019; bh=BOgcqlw6y8iIgbHjMAc1g4Gi4IOjTDrxxNQ2HyGiS+8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=lTY/vTYYcwNUU985EScWVYgn0b7c1NikM4DbO20QhM0NKIMtYqXsFITl8zmrkKpvi 0q1F44XzJT0/rUlcoxHWcQTxAwIEj3pdhtKL7Q7uH4GDQ2raw6LqF9Y/t/XFI+n406 jpbXJvD0swALjeakSQQJWtNbUUctISfnOVddD5CM=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 318A620E408E; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:23:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:23:38 -0500
Message-ID: <3711970.F67YVxsDXC@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.4; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20120309043135.60337.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <20120309043135.60337.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: [apps-discuss] Running code ...
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:23:40 -0000

On Friday, March 09, 2012 04:31:35 AM John Levine wrote:
...
> 
> Sounds cool.  Anyone likely to implement it?  The IETF has a well known
> preference for running code.

Although DNS provisioning systems seem to be a notable exception to this rule.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email