Re: [apps-discuss] Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Thu, 23 May 2013 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F017021F89BA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lbrzwg7kQErk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7CD21F90EB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4NDqos8018832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 May 2013 06:52:54 -0700
Message-ID: <519E1F2F.9060008@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:52:47 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <61CB1D18-BABC-4C77-93E6-A9E8CDA8326B@vpnc.org> <CABP7RbcUJJoPJYdCOGSoa8fJfqj+R5RttjDtG5zXDirUV9OMQA@mail.gmail.com> <3638B63C-0E75-4E99-BF65-28F83DB856A6@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwjKzHnOKDp0dmHN1Czes-f7tcJ2U1qz7S_HoSpcfKMyyA@mail.gmail.com> <002201ce5781$5ee92b20$1cbb8160$@packetizer.com> <25F67EB3-B70E-4A19-AD08-7B4ADC6ECC63@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <25F67EB3-B70E-4A19-AD08-7B4ADC6ECC63@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.67]); Thu, 23 May 2013 06:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, 'IETF Apps Discuss' <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:53:24 -0000

On 5/23/2013 1:11 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> More importantly, EXI is based on an XML data model; the JSON model is what I'm interested in.


Beginner's question:

      How does/should the differences in data model affect the choices 
in encoding scheme?  I'm looking for the (relatively) short answer.

Tnx.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net