IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records

"Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net> Wed, 05 March 2003 02:23 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19272 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:23:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h252Xsj02739 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:33:54 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h252Xs502736 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:33:54 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19265; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:22:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h252X0502690; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:33:00 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h252Wu502676 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:32:56 -0500
Received: from mail.asianet.co.th (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19252 for <Asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:21:40 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200303050221.VAA19252@ietf.org>
Received: from virscan1.asianet.co.th (HELO mx.asianet.co.th) ([203.144.222.197]) (envelope-sender <jrace@attglobal.net>) by mail1.asianet.co.th (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <Asrg@ietf.org>; 5 Mar 2003 09:24:07 +0700
Received: from ppp-203.144.179.122.revip.asianet.co.th (HELO localhost) ([203.144.179.122]) (envelope-sender <jrace@attglobal.net>) by mx2.asianet.co.th (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <Asrg@ietf.org>; 5 Mar 2003 09:14:19 +0700
From: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
To: "Asrg@ietf.org" <Asrg@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 1.96a For OS/2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:23:27 +0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:08:59 -0700 (MST), Vernon Schryver wrote:

>Sending
>from one domain name with a return address in another domain has always
>been an explicit design goal at least as far as the Reply-To header
>is concerned.  That the Sender header exists, suggests that differing
>SMTP client reverse DNS domaon name and Mail_From values has been a
>goal.  For at least 15 years allowing such mismatches have been a
>practical requirement.

Yes, I could not participate in this list were it otherwise.  I have
to get my mail at my USA POP server, but I must send from my current
location in Bangkok where the POP provider (AT&T) has no SMTP node.

Jeffrey Race

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email