Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)
abuse <abuse@aniota.com> Mon, 10 March 2003 08:35 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA21222 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:35:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2A8m9d23597 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:48:09 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2A8m7O23594 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:48:09 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA21129 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:34:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2A8k6O23494; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:46:06 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2A8iFO23422 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:44:15 -0500
Received: from yossarian.aniota.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA20383 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:30:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yossarian.aniota.com (IDENT:abuse@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by yossarian.aniota.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2A8Wr21020660 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:32:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (abuse@localhost) by yossarian.aniota.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h2A8WrwK020657 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:32:53 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: yossarian.aniota.net: abuse owned process doing -bs
From: abuse <abuse@aniota.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)
In-Reply-To: <p06000a0eba91d9ce53a1@[192.168.1.104]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303100007380.20600-100000@yossarian.aniota.net>
References: <E18qJqx-0003Lt-00@mail.nitros9.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303042143080.2979@shishi.roaringpenguin.com> <p06000911ba8b17e3e0a8@[192.168.1.104]> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303050847550.2048@shishi.roaringpenguin.com> <3E683148.10306@americasm01.nt.com> <3E6A11F7.6050809@harvee.org> <p0600091aba8ff3474bf4@[192.168.1.104]> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303081827410.16289-100000@yossarian.aniota.net> <p06000a06ba91375c4107@[192.168.1.104]> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303091452280.19743-100000@yossarian.aniota.net> <p06000a0eba91d9ce53a1@[192.168.1.104]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:32:53 -0800
on "3-10-2003" "Kee Hinckley" writ: : a challenge-response system that assumes that "human == can-see". ... that, is a secondary assumption. the primary, is one in which the ability to 'read' made. that sounds perposterous (sp et al), howeever, it offers a fundamental premise. a certain level of 'experience' is required to use the offerings of the internet. those of us with visual 'handicaps' do what has to be done, to get done, what needs doing. others of us, may not have the 'abiilty' or 'willingness' to do that. now, 'mandating' a standards 'change' for the benefit of a miniscule population, who may not even benefit from it, is not a prudent design decision. in my opinion, any change in standards is going to offer minimal long term benefits ... _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Derek J. Balling
- [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] domain specific DNS blacklists (or whi… wayne
- Re: [Asrg] domain specific DNS blacklists (or whi… Roland
- [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Roland
- DNS is broken, and by extension so is RMX (Re: [A… Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Gary Feldman
- [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Peter A. Friend
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Derek J. Balling
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Gary Feldman
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Alan DeKok
- False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records) David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Troy Rollo
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Derek J. Balling
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Troy Rollo
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX and DS Records Gordon Fecyk - Home
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Fwd: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Matt Sergeant
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Good versus bad (was Re: RMX Records ) Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Alan DeKok
- [Asrg] Re: False Positives Peter A. Friend
- Re: [Asrg] Good versus bad (was Re: RMX Records ) Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Good versus bad (was Re: RMX Records ) David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Terry Carmen
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Good versus bad (was Re: RMX Records ) Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Kee Hinckley
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… abuse
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Kee Hinckley
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… abuse
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… abuse
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Recor… Wilson Roberto Afonso