IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Charter

<N.Leymann@telekom.de> Mon, 25 September 2017 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBCE13304D for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telekom.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7tsmzXwPQMJH for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout24.telekom.de (MAILOUT24.telekom.de [80.149.113.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18172133047 for <banana@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telekom.de; i=@telekom.de; q=dns/txt; s=dtag1; t=1506328967; x=1537864967; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=y9YE2jIkju4byd9u0kEqnJ7ZjiCNOkb+Al3lty6wlSk=; b=3KaB9soUSy6Km4yCtUkPJ9+tQxB8jReaTQqJSBrvwkI5O+r16e6/EA9j mNAP/68ujylVEUtmLC+LFsDl8moFVTiuJVyUXs5c40jFJ3eY+GHGpqaS1 uINYl5ozMkCg7/mZzVmFHxOJt+JTWDDlHl1u/2wKRii0InNy/uGEpRHjY DYY/nipjbpoMFRjSB8cYzgSO1CPxmQ8JZCrDcAMEQlaJgO6MM1INuUOYb 7gt/yan6hWmP3EerPV+FMQGsXManOii4N22NmZmUjU+pyaNTHYgiijqpp 5yRrfgMJ3LL7c4AV6Alh3oQr8VZCcio7QJZukAHSTV/n5tqd0HPtwb3Z+ Q==;
Received: from qdezc2.de.t-internal.com ([10.171.255.37]) by MAILOUT21.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Sep 2017 10:42:44 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,435,1500933600"; d="scan'208";a="668618358"
Received: from he105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.169.119.58]) by qde0ps.de.t-internal.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 25 Sep 2017 10:42:43 +0200
Received: from HE105662.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.58) by HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:42:43 +0200
Received: from HE105662.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::442c:834e:c489:d2c4]) by HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::442c:834e:c489:d2c4%26]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.002; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:42:43 +0200
From: N.Leymann@telekom.de
To: sgundave@cisco.com, margaretw42@gmail.com
CC: david.i.allan@ericsson.com, praveen.muley@nokia.com, alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com, suresh.krishnan@gmail.com, david.sinicrope@ericsson.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, banana@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [Banana] Charter
Thread-Index: AQHS/w5lXMtIffsXq0694fWkm5K0oaJYdBGAgERGvoCAFlpQAIACeiYAgAVPAwCABCUegIABNiSAgADHUoCAAFWfAIAAFQSAgAADDICABEHXkA==
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:42:43 +0000
Message-ID: <c8be7675ca0e4cad99e0b58ff9d1ed13@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <96A7BC33-FB64-487A-A60D-7AB8504C9DDF@gmail.com> <a1df884a51f246a7969c0057ff78d807@BTWP000357.corp.ads> <C3A4BFB9-EAD7-4B32-90C1-248D6D74ECD1@gmail.com> <9A767D1D-C6CA-4C7D-A281-7150E259881D@gmail.com> <DB5PR07MB13998EE07C5B5D5DBACED79C9B1A0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7ED94797-5E72-4191-B861-4CD2F410BBD5@gmail.com> <7i60gox0c8.wl-jch@irif.fr> <DB5PR07MB1399FEDB262E0205457EA8AB9BFC0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <87bmqgov69.wl-jch@irif.fr> <DB5PR07MB1399977AFFE9FA7D19A2D34D9BFC0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0d8ce583860345b89020113f1239be5d@BTWP000357.corp.ads> <21BD0F20-9CE5-466B-992E-93F6D84DB7D4@gmail.com> <95788B92-E8C1-4FE6-9B0C-7F29361D9297@trammell.ch> <d3759d89-9f6e-bcf4-8c44-32f3f435d784@gmail.com> <01e83ac6-0bd0-e7c7-01e4-0ffb7af73034@gmail.com> <4B6D7CF5-E6BC-4ECA-9299-7458A624320B@nokia.com> <HE1PR0701MB21884F35D61DDA53426CDCBEEA9C0@HE1PR0701MB2188.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <D5DE884A.28A3E7%sgundave@cisco.com> <ABACEE0C-8ED6-468B-9746-923321CCCCBB@gmail.com> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C68F5500E@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <A9F6ED60-98F7-4014-91C1-F7634E51DB2B@ericsson.com> <B6ED8E95-B68C-4EC9-934C-B28AA1CB3587@gmail.com> <AA18EE02-CC24-46FB-B3F7-3865387BD178@gmail.com> <D5EA7894.3C5E%sgundave@cisco.com> <2611ECFB-8A08-4FB1-B73F-B84283E94C7E@gmail.com> <D5EA93CB.3D25%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5EA93CB.3D25%sgundave@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.110.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/2D6LcYKVOC-KvVPz9zaSW2TSX7E>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Charter
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:42:49 -0000

Hi Sri,

I do not agree here. Yes, DLS+LTE is a very valid use case with a lot of momentum, but there are other use cases which were also mentioned during the BoF. E.g. Bundling of SAT + DSL (and in fact there are offerings, providing Internet over Satellite for home users as well with - very small bandwidth DSL - as a backup). Why do you assume that WiFi means WAN? Most of the home routers today provide WLAN and there are scenarios where the WLAN of different customers is being aggregated. 

I think we should not rule out any technology for the BANANA work.

Regards

Nic


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. September 2017 19:21
An: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
Cc: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>; Muley, Praveen (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <praveen.muley@nokia.com>; Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>; Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>; David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@ericsson.com>; Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>; banana@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [Banana] Charter



On 9/22/17, 10:09 AM, "Margaret Cullen" <margaretw42@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) 
>><sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> IF we step back, the motivation for this work is DSL + LTE aggregation.
>
>Actually, there are quite a few people who have indicated that they 
>would like to aggregate other link types.  There was a presentation at 
>IETF-97 about aggregating LTE and Wifi, one person on this thread 
>mentioned wanted to aggregate two WiFi links, another person has talked 
>about aggregating VPN links. etc.
>

So, LTE and DSL are out;  WiFi as a WAN link to home is not a known service; SATRAN access to home is unheard of.

So, what are the two remaining links that are not WiFi, LTE, DSL, SATRAN and not aggregation?




_______________________________________________
Banana mailing list
Banana@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email