IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Charter

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850F4132930 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XgHmSucgwPwo for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0E0132F7A for <banana@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505311910; x=1506521510; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Y9YnW1gqWGp8ta2iuAhMpcC/aOIp/tPcHc1PKR56qG4=; b=e2nxqq8CO0x6m4AgFa8qZZoww6/v3TwwVdf+0MmjND1i1lNLp9dyvSmV MuZO7ycJqG4JaHJZg5NQ383CQlrLJMPcqYOdGFeGjMsTxO7qNatEwA86Q cW3uBfCEKP9reXu6tWb+7XU8UFeNhsmFCrIkFfYBzvVjLJhCiBIKcSmK6 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A4BACvO7lZ/40NJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1qBUicHnjWCa5UvghIKhT4ChFJBFgECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkGOj8QAgEINhAyJQIEDgUbihavVYs2AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR+DK4ICgVCBY4JzNYprBaB4ApRQknSVAgIRGQGBOAEmCyaBDXcVh2Z2hyuBDwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,388,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="293001262"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Sep 2017 14:11:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8DEBnE7021766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:11:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:11:48 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:11:48 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "Muley, Praveen (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <praveen.muley@nokia.com>
CC: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] Charter
Thread-Index: AQHS/w5lhWOFLy/yHEWQ/Po5rcE+YqJYdBGAgERGvoCAFlpQAA==
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:11:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D5DE884A.28A3E7%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <96A7BC33-FB64-487A-A60D-7AB8504C9DDF@gmail.com> <a1df884a51f246a7969c0057ff78d807@BTWP000357.corp.ads> <C3A4BFB9-EAD7-4B32-90C1-248D6D74ECD1@gmail.com> <9A767D1D-C6CA-4C7D-A281-7150E259881D@gmail.com> <DB5PR07MB13998EE07C5B5D5DBACED79C9B1A0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7ED94797-5E72-4191-B861-4CD2F410BBD5@gmail.com> <7i60gox0c8.wl-jch@irif.fr> <DB5PR07MB1399FEDB262E0205457EA8AB9BFC0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <87bmqgov69.wl-jch@irif.fr> <DB5PR07MB1399977AFFE9FA7D19A2D34D9BFC0@DB5PR07MB1399.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0d8ce583860345b89020113f1239be5d@BTWP000357.corp.ads> <21BD0F20-9CE5-466B-992E-93F6D84DB7D4@gmail.com> <95788B92-E8C1-4FE6-9B0C-7F29361D9297@trammell.ch> <d3759d89-9f6e-bcf4-8c44-32f3f435d784@gmail.com> <01e83ac6-0bd0-e7c7-01e4-0ffb7af73034@gmail.com> <4B6D7CF5-E6BC-4ECA-9299-7458A624320B@nokia.com> <HE1PR0701MB21884F35D61DDA53426CDCBEEA9C0@HE1PR0701MB2188.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB21884F35D61DDA53426CDCBEEA9C0@HE1PR0701MB2188.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.188.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8329D9DB1C14DE4396270D6DC07D71BC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/EgcvfYBVBc7r-xXQaO7n6Q1jhp4>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Charter
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:12:02 -0000


On 8/29/17, 6:51 PM, "Banana on behalf of Muley, Praveen (Nokia -
US/Mountain View)" <banana-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of
praveen.muley@nokia.com> wrote:

>Since the discussion on encapsulations  has NOT progressed further. Would
>like to understand also about other candidate solutions  which were
>mentioned in the BOF like MP-TCP or MP-UDP/QUIC ?  If these solutions are
>progressing already in other WG what are we  planning to do here ?


I have the same comment. It is not clear to me either on what exactly this
WG intends to do. In the BOF (WG-forming) meeting, there was no
opportunity given to raise any questions on the problem statement. The
entire focus of the meeting was on some charter text without any
discussions on 1.) problem statement, 2.) currently known art, 3.) efforts
in other WG groups,4.) the gaps.  There was no agreement on IETF 98 BOF
meeting (non-WG forming) either on the problem statement. So, I do no
understand why we are jumping on charter text discussion without clear
agreements on the problem statement.

I really hope IESG will review all the notes/discussions carefully.




Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email