Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs
Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Thu, 13 April 2023 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D984C14CE51 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtGMUhPp1fcw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90F8C14CE4C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id k20so10808438ual.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681404096; x=1683996096; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sq/92YowSbTeqvK460z4/qfR3OStx0xkxj0/IzNoxOI=; b=ii74piNl+Loyafbu7yQ8S+dbWLrqOEw2nVbof2/5uKlk8LICARytipR6I2u5NIBhq+ JhpXiISbN29Cn5xfrA5EvzOFfHjn/ciWK500EoCGia/C+woEdpLoSB04q6rMg+zw23j4 8KSIpH5USCZwnoJFsGMX5DxeL0wB5lj4FEROxUEk/WHhM3bqTVAzkmRrdaXNsZ29pSrL X3JUsuijuSsQJlW+9J8OuNQ82wVLMasVX0js+tXklSzSnOV0nSHpa4DH8qCxsrsgkV/y F9X3k02ep7Wy1h0/dHq7yVlRL3DpUS2yr9Fo6bb3ZowHb76JHY7BQIKyVKtaXpO/ku30 MyDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681404096; x=1683996096; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sq/92YowSbTeqvK460z4/qfR3OStx0xkxj0/IzNoxOI=; b=VXnh2fLm0N6gKlfL4B9h7ndgrOGhjVbyR3POFfAcTDvYcQrGSnKgGbbEqIIOLkU26F E7aolqJ9rsrQ765j8SBBQlsQOYR4vgYiTKSLvcEI4ykDmrg1ef8IY1X+Z+KmM9t1iHYG HSYZ7/IVZbWwenvmmoTDJeTPccdiOKtHq69KHleF5zIWX0/VkDqbe46p70ow+tGtRWZB wHszQpQhDLn30mcqlK5ZfZXBrM2EDRroBeTPhDFNkua5sX3NHmEGTKjZTpVM2ZnpjECR CxSMnZi77ZIMbyYe2PNDyvemkhldX8KFMjgxwGBR210hD21D3qdQAYLvnjrEEmyBEQdr tsgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cQG03BUQ6C+Fz0zSW9LB0Z0DbW6CbpPDLkaugrDOngCFP0utFe CzA1EgSZkl/lZGWglpHu9YGzJDHhsDBOvN8GamE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bE4JVx7zXL6Dj4nCT+plyL4aTbIFZpYyJcbDJpT5IaghKVA2iKazQNJXy4z8mRW/91G1MesEfCwCgbm9k6Cgc=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2012:0:b0:440:60f4:cb30 with SMTP id g18-20020a1f2012000000b0044060f4cb30mr324450vkg.3.1681404096429; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYbbLLq-qLg_Wnp5aFw_2my4UTZz3U3LjwbCmpMNdudfA@mail.gmail.com> <20230413151342.B96D0BF17F1F@ary.qy> <CALaySJKM5Kct0u0ekuEBS=DVQTXG_CiewpzNwVyPiAaQ9zx3VA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nyYrCXPo8aYOb+cVSf=2NQDOBmUgo-FD=ohPBZ=yFuHw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+6JxGua90o8kgyoFH48swn6f0g8x+Jx4By4jQnC7ot8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+6JxGua90o8kgyoFH48swn6f0g8x+Jx4By4jQnC7ot8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:41:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYddHX20JOJfURAsVhpzi6HobX90qim=5Zw2jpbq5KsNJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4427905f93a65a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ohEZx-H94COUpbnn676gLybjOMo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:41:41 -0000
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:19 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Maybe just add a sentence to the end of the second paragraph: > > The use of SPF alone, without DKIM, is strongly NOT RECOMMENDED. > > Barry > I think the opposite. Something along the lines of "Sending domains SHOULD implement both SPF and DKIM to minimize breakage and non-delivery of mail. Michael Hammer > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:04 PM Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> >> wrote: >> >>> > Anyone who does forwarding is damaged by DMARC because there are a lot >>> of >>> > people who do DMARC on the cheap with SPF only. >>> >>> This brings up another issue, I think: that there should also be >>> stronger advice that using DKIM is critical to DMARC reliability, and >>> using SPF only, without DKIM, is strongly NOT RECOMMENDED. >>> >>> I don't disagree. >> >> How do we make the following text stronger? >> 5.5.2. >> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#section-5.5.2>Configure >> Sending System for DKIM Signing Using an Aligned Domain >> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#name-configure-sending-system-fo> >> >> While it is possible to secure a DMARC pass verdict based on only one of >> SPF or DKIM, it is commonly accepted best practice to ensure that both >> authentication mechanisms are in place to guard against failure of just one >> of them. >> >> This is particularly important because SPF will always fail in situations >> where mail is sent to a forwarding address offered by a professional >> society, school or other institution, where the address simply relays the >> message to the recipient's current "real" address. Many recipients use such >> addresses and with SPF alone and not DKIM, messages sent to such users will >> always produce DMARC fail. >> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#section-5.5.2-2> >> >> The Domain Owner SHOULD choose a DKIM-Signing domain (i.e., the d= >> domain in the DKIM-Signature header) that aligns with the Author Domain. >> >> >> -- >> >> *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem >> *e:* todd.herr@valimail.com >> *m:* 703.220.4153 >> >> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or >> proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) >> authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized >> recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or >> distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited >> and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to >> this email and then delete it from your system. >> > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
- [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Mark Alley
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Wei Chuang
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely