Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 15 April 2023 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F7DC14CE5F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvM_49RfztwV for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0E2C14CEED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-505048d50aeso319799a12.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681517863; x=1684109863; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=b+2LSh+lMkohWSWS4VaoAEQXcQR2h3f2b+PF064ObdY=; b=lwpzGnx35r8Dg5R6/bI5jxW+ZWTfgVtYpX3hPkzgXaJIAdwtUujvs9jT11ixQAqDLZ I/2nwm2cURj83AkcyXMhz3SRriUPJFm0IA1tej60rcIdA6Q45ADCV+nvdiWSjm8vaq0Q FyrTcDAWh31gwPQ5rmsK4gUwZQhbpEyJAuvRw2Ay8qgMnSz++Xuuoorvrbi4THDUfHzZ 5sHPjaWA3uymbAsqsn2dtHLXCh6CgmWP2Y+aHDpVz1V93mgqijZ3Qtbel8PzsWdSq5ED lYeZPE6o1guAij9MWSUXmKygZ0d/cfmx55uYECVev8xx66RoZfAyAlTaJTelB8FUoLYA d7Bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681517863; x=1684109863; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=b+2LSh+lMkohWSWS4VaoAEQXcQR2h3f2b+PF064ObdY=; b=husgtaK5ktUwiIvUc+85X3P/E/WQfeiL8QAzV3r3/xi8xCi3X7DWEhrsIA7iKrMhVV LYOK8rE0eMbPZyqS/cFeP4r1nqKDyF5jsFtGxllnkDOngKhDcB9DMqIf1Xy8x8sTc/hJ +s5hJ8mYKZL3+IU8NQmqXC4qieIXHGfIT/46DC0g0nqVrEMEKVGFjk6BGbM19I21hPeq 2iq2GmGRH/DtSYWbz7duJxIB6KlvakkQGO+u/z3yqMeSuyapk/3RxZb6vj5VfkxBCX69 DCyM1DBauQVGwKRifddcrGCTasSaAnwhbB6zhpsqNHLX1EXKlo+timEHXQz3ajf3QYpU 4j6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9e9PtxemvgIuhBLxrPbkUWDq2hZlNkGCC3SrXFAqb+QHRtSSGZu xar36Y3qp9yPVqzCCCVIqDV2flaRA/zyPkhFDN0CRATT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YEV2kGxBrEpel12EDD3r1AOdWEMJONK06uOPP4gR8JEwmDgY7ubFx3UIZKTDI7q6/VMyYhg0EHscXR8R1pvc8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:74da:b0:94f:a13:6386 with SMTP id z26-20020a17090674da00b0094f0a136386mr1062619ejl.7.1681517863106; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZc2X7tyP+_8vvL3Yb7uJk6td3XGbsXUB68BNUEMhV4yQ@mail.gmail.com> <909C826B-2745-4BE8-AD16-920E6DE86D1C@kitterman.com> <329db752-fdeb-7633-ede1-06e435db1c0e@tana.it> <6600461.14hOuAKI9C@localhost> <CAH48Zfwgyr6EGb1Ty3v7gVzEDbMr5dig_GVz79gwqx4F0zsEZA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfwgyr6EGb1Ty3v7gVzEDbMr5dig_GVz79gwqx4F0zsEZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:17:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZToWMh3cO-1zvvMZBFvo2o_PF+aRD58kAEZ0OObOcQNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9fc9e05f954e208"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/V2Dy3eJVP-VY-6ZEgflAALjJah4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 00:17:50 -0000

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023, 14:51 Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> Interoperability problems occur because MLMs believe they are exempt from
> the security problems that lesser mortals face.
>

This isn't true. Interoperability problems started when senders posted a
restrictive policy and receivers began enforcing it. The MLMs didn't have a
chance to form such a belief structure before things were already broken.


The Sender or MLM may be unhappy if lost eyes mean lost revenue, but an
> evaluator is tasked with disappointing senders, many times per day.
>

The Sender's users being denied the ability to participate in a list due to
its policies seems to me like it puts this customer service problem where
it belongs.

Document the issue as a customer service problem and I am on board.
>

Indeed.

-MSK, participating