IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs

Mark Alley <mark.alley@tekmarc.com> Thu, 13 April 2023 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.alley@tekmarc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C42C151B25 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tekmarc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vSb3Ky_B7h0H for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb42.google.com (mail-yb1-xb42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD212C1516F8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb42.google.com with SMTP id n203so4068890ybg.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tekmarc.com; s=google; t=1681400669; x=1683992669; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9HXNYnDj8jjGFFj2KNB2owZDVnVnmXsgOLrwpTipYNM=; b=kq/gQbDiNunq+PsAz5fzr8stifyrwodLbaUutdMvuag3hT17VN3dD2BqnjuZBfdpFj 8+coYKorry3RrUZgRRzqgY/k/XNOkacbZI70v9nOnEIWIM+Db79gtyKhHiwj+l01rkHY SE1/9OGZ9zzuMwRQIlyLWISyZi8ol3nCuV8e6/7vzJQM0/Q9pbjqkVa3cJjvCxutuvhM CI4o3bdU12gnJXfaq4kYAKG278o8DFZlSyVsDUGT6amXQpkcxYqbzzSsb8M5jFdDjYA9 hsE54jiNqs65hXTnjQBEWMIlTEDxUDuJHoZ489q2U+IrKsAyHQ96fMuDjBK5GBGDZadY KIYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681400669; x=1683992669; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9HXNYnDj8jjGFFj2KNB2owZDVnVnmXsgOLrwpTipYNM=; b=ktPseYJeUa0BH5WwPdpdhC96GCi7oi2M91+sZUaqGesYmabLm7/D2jZTeyksX0Euil JkoLZb5UsZFlmvULcI78tnH16yQT/RxyDM9oSDlFkJEA7leF115XgYkR3NFXEWgxmiw0 YGA/MzvUVYL3EyHCnlBa+psIUpGIDd5o3F/T5UpTYYSqJPuJ2FzotCwOEYKIPCR76EFB Dp5aWXSnQ4A6eKDv3715yAcb+3olidkSV7tSH8sdxqKtVCsvcRLTVTGOXWFnOG2o6gVI 6AxvmVXvqnDH7h0M9U5iOkQQkXFi48YFbwZ7IZc7yiyFO2PE2ynTWcSAEh6d5K+jlovP +nIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eN5yTHfkeiMBRjVgQEcTZEVCeBrHtUtg7pvQANr5ZW6x6v4rw3 U5WWZeBMY1CQ885ChMSb5/0rPf/O9OV+xSA0cyTRbjmmPB4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YsxiWEJCbUH8DTBsuzENMPMRzkqhLsQiJ19H5i8ATJuA+42P5bKnXytrHW2e3tqgsoYhi5xg==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1b05:0:b0:b73:225f:6534 with SMTP id b5-20020a251b05000000b00b73225f6534mr2392797ybb.26.1681400669110; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.20] (162-238-103-217.lightspeed.brhmal.sbcglobal.net. [162.238.103.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f185-20020a2551c2000000b00b8f517ecdc5sm511109ybb.35.2023.04.13.08.44.28 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------itMTzgrAFe2oH9qNbojItG5C"
Message-ID: <eacb783d-0574-ce45-dbb9-32a804a5ab74@tekmarc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:44:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwYbbLLq-qLg_Wnp5aFw_2my4UTZz3U3LjwbCmpMNdudfA@mail.gmail.com> <20230413151342.B96D0BF17F1F@ary.qy> <CALaySJKM5Kct0u0ekuEBS=DVQTXG_CiewpzNwVyPiAaQ9zx3VA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Alley <mark.alley@tekmarc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKM5Kct0u0ekuEBS=DVQTXG_CiewpzNwVyPiAaQ9zx3VA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tM11R8T5EhzjOl9QJWAZW7APLPE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:44:34 -0000

+1

On 4/13/2023 10:21 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> Anyone who does forwarding is damaged by DMARC because there are a lot of
>> people who do DMARC on the cheap with SPF only.
> This brings up another issue, I think: that there should also be
> stronger advice that using DKIM is critical to DMARC reliability, and
> using SPF only, without DKIM, is strongly NOT RECOMMENDED.
>
> Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email