Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-dprive@u-1.phicoh.com> Sat, 10 June 2023 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636E9C151B3F for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 10:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61kn9Nh5EYpt for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2a10:3781:2413:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A771AC151B29 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1q82YG-0000MXC; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 19:39:00 +0200
Message-Id: <m1q82YG-0000MXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-dprive@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <64e17d73-ea1a-00cb-a8a5-b5cfb39c37ae@innovationslab.net> <45ada5a8-b483-dae7-eb56-88411fb2f75c@innovationslab.net> <7a3cd83a-b80d-f00d-b050-0a1d4845146b@innovationslab.net> <D7C916AC-E47D-45FE-9976-188DAE0775EF@icann.org> <CADyWQ+HMj5NH1g_oCTNxYkGDmp2L3EwmMyOv2-bXeXvp5kvm0A@mail.gmail.com> <6B55CCC0-069F-43DD-B9DA-024E4334D6F4@icann.org> <20c5ac1666e4428b8ffa70c7b9e8a19c@verisign.com> <CADyWQ+HJ7ZLWfwxr6vb9HsERMJXuu-1zD_=cr4S+mZ1ieWrYwQ@mail.gmail.com> <0007CDA7-ADD3-43BB-B5D3-3B1810206E0E@icann.org> <8fbed8926b3f4e28b9f3f76a85e0b619@verisign.com> <CANMuhxt5cE--GUtapEL69dFkAFSU5dF3psMCgNRKj8_dXpsFLA@mail.gmail.com> <ABE27A4A-BA96-4505-A3E3-1FE83CAA5A63@icann.org> <m1q6YGM-0000KoC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <3B79D45A-1F95-4A4A-9F8D-D3D9C424B4B2@icann.org> <m1q6oAa-0000KqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E68DAF11-E748-4F3C-AAD3-4E5921B652D9@icann.org> <m1q7FM5-0000LSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9E965077-D2BA-46C7-99EC-5B4C37918069@icann.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:29:31 +0000 ." <9E965077-D2BA-46C7-99EC-5B4C37918069@icann.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 19:38:58 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/Aj580uqcvGo4oEqCuS_985tOoVU>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 17:39:31 -0000

> In such a case, resolvers following
> this protocol will look for authoritative answers to ports 53 and
> 853 on that system, and the system would need to be able to
> differentiate queries for recursive answers from queries for
> authoritative answers.

For lack of a better term, I use the word 'lame' here:

If, during probing, a recursive resolver decides that the authoritative
server on port 853 is 'lame', then the recursive resolver should fall back
to port 53.