Re: [dns-privacy] [dnsdir] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de> Thu, 06 July 2023 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF221C13AE51; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MRP4dOk0wh9k; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.narrans.de (michelangelo.narrans.de [IPv6:2001:19f0:6c01:821:5400:1ff:fe33:a36d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57417C13AE4F; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pinkunicorn (2001-1c00-270d-e800-d525-2b80-a144-09bc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl [2001:1c00:270d:e800:d525:2b80:a144:9bc]) by michelangelo.narrans.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b7cabb76 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 6 Jul 2023 20:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, "dnsdir@ietf.org" <dnsdir@ietf.org>
References: <64e17d73-ea1a-00cb-a8a5-b5cfb39c37ae@innovationslab.net> <8fbed8926b3f4e28b9f3f76a85e0b619@verisign.com> <CANMuhxt5cE--GUtapEL69dFkAFSU5dF3psMCgNRKj8_dXpsFLA@mail.gmail.com> <ABE27A4A-BA96-4505-A3E3-1FE83CAA5A63@icann.org> <m1q6YGM-0000KoC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <3B79D45A-1F95-4A4A-9F8D-D3D9C424B4B2@icann.org> <m1q6oAa-0000KqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E68DAF11-E748-4F3C-AAD3-4E5921B652D9@icann.org> <m1q7FM5-0000LSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9E965077-D2BA-46C7-99EC-5B4C37918069@icann.org> <m1q82YG-0000MXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <B2088F5F-60B6-4796-B16F-ED7F42838B72@icann.org> <m14jndnsh3.fsf@narrans.de> <B9001CCC-3686-4EED-8B2E-856291269240@icann.org> <m1ilbqhsyr.fsf@narrans.de> <24B7D6A7-0200-431F-87C8-913D92C68C8C@icann.org> <m15y75szjw.fsf@narrans.de> <E819B3A1-A3C8-4AE9-84D8-D9F9C992CB99@icann.org> <578023ded20b16d081d2e40f9ef55821681a80ef.camel@powerdns.com> <3f0f1e2d5ccfadb535a65d30158fd8cc2ac4a7bc.camel@powerdns.com> <BA9D7433-663F-4FC3-81AE-C34FE5920363@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 20:02:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <BA9D7433-663F-4FC3-81AE-C34FE5920363@icann.org> (Paul Hoffman's message of "Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:02:28 +0000")
Message-ID: <m18rbsq5ol.fsf@narrans.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/BI22nNfyfPLjakbi1hvmqg7cgdM>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [dnsdir] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 18:02:46 -0000

On 2023-07-03 11:02 UTC, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2023, at 11:19 AM, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 10:50 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2023-06-30 at 16:32 +0000, Paul Hoffman via dnsdir wrote:
>>>> The current wording at the end of 4.6.9 is:
>>>>    But if `R` is unsuccessful (e.g. timeout or connection closed):
>>>> 
>>>> I believe that changing that to the following would fix the problem you describe:
>>>>    But if `R` is unsuccessful (RCODE other than 0, timeout, connection closed):
>>>> 
>>>> Does that fix your case and not break other cases?
>>> 
>>> You need to allow, at a minimum, RCODE 3 (NXDomain) too.
>> 
>> After a poke from Paul, a clearer version: both RCODE 0 and RCODE 3 can
>> be good responses from an auth.
>
> That's a good point. So, my suggested change becomes:
>
>> The current wording at the end of 4.6.9 is:
>>    But if `R` is unsuccessful (e.g. timeout or connection closed):
>> 
>> I believe that changing that to the following would fix the problem you describe:
>>    But if `R` is unsuccessful (RCODE other than 0 or 3, timeout, connection closed):
>>

yes, that will probably work.

>
> I'll make that change soon unless someone points out other problems with it.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

-- 
In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.