Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

On Jun 6, 2023, at 7:49 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <[e-mail]> wrote:
> [SAH] The criteria to conduct the experiment and measure the outcome could be 
> documented in the current draft.

Please propose such criteria. I ask because I feel that the likely criteria (at least one resolver implementation, one server implementation, and interop testing between the two of them) has already been met.

Or are you saying that, if we include the criteria in the current draft, and show that they are met, that we can proceed on standards track without changing the charter?

> From there:
> 
> Publish experimental RFC.
> Conduct experiment.
> Publish RFCbis I-D to document the results of the experiment with 
> informational status for failure or standards track for success.

See above.

> Assuming success, recharter to publish RFCbis I-D on the standards track.
> Adopt RFCbis I-D as a working group document.
> Working group works to publish RFCbis on the standards track.
> 
> Paul is correct in noting that there's more IETF effort associated with the 
> above. It's worth making that effort to ensure that the risks to critical 
> internet infrastructure are minimized.

How would you put that (legitimate!) concern into a criterion for the experiment?

--Paul Hoffman