Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 07 May 2023 04:59 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D214C151B02 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 21:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="g55yXTIT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="fXckwix7"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxU55OW3KxPf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 21:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733D6C1519A9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 May 2023 21:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 41827 invoked from network); 7 May 2023 04:59:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=a356.64573043.k2305; bh=BU+Ymf654JBDIU6bv+GyyWiP2T8R6lzyTV4YGwaCDuw=; b=g55yXTITnW/zozLQ/L+YGKc0AHa7WrSsxaDzzs/fDX7QrO66+DO0gdvfOVFVNW0yeSOfY5/3ErOJJniTk0Fpe3ICOVqV3ods2uBQt2xTpbt3UDwx7H13k9QG30whVikGzUuDg+oCgDCZNjlZyR2ms+Q/rKhHI9kzrLueqbtwJLvQPTxzoIy7o4F9pUYQmMvyJjgQtoB9JzRd+h2eWTL+k0dJWFdE8fFQP0UYpN2vGuZr5TZb7w3Zi81/T90Y+kZmwyaEpqPP0uiLDaLra+FbuTZ0aYpBrLOU282CfDtkCg8YaA1ej8w1sejWa+Rbus7XnfGYlM1J5CtKHuhGlqczSw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=a356.64573043.k2305; bh=BU+Ymf654JBDIU6bv+GyyWiP2T8R6lzyTV4YGwaCDuw=; b=fXckwix7kdbtzZ60uK63m35eiZ2VXCNc4OghiE2EF8aG/mjIBSHY++hBGeUUWCj0awvGjaoUiZlgQiI93zfDEn7zsDeAVIB0ox8Xa4gCbAIFR5RW+fCP5RMfWabkj/gRcqaMwjDyVc4u8GkG+zDYlFv7ITYOSiDruqTxeIabg57fLdQB9ZRLnUb21z05CWlvzeKBxRXLBhOgaVaolu5Tp+Qx6y8cmJt2jUl337FnxHJ5yoqLS6q2Rw8MVEU6autECS5AAzwiy4gUsPrG79rl9aIlDgkwoWQC/wFJJR0fgRRMLNtRb+Go6jyhEvvVQA2hCKQEpa4u6NRTbxphkn7sMg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 May 2023 04:59:47 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9CB9BD017B17; Sat, 6 May 2023 20:38:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 20:38:54 -0400
Message-Id: <20230507045946.9CB9BD017B17@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: el@lisse.NA
In-Reply-To: <2abfdd2d-baff-77f6-76b9-b6d0f40739fd@lisse.NA>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U6ftlEFXP_WVWWPC2oC-yrNuIp8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 04:59:58 -0000
It appears that Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> said: >The IANA Function Operator does so for all ccTLDs (which would imply all TLDs). Indeed, but some of them are lame anyway. Here's today's report: FAIL ne. bow.rain.fr. 194.51.3.49 All nameservers failed to answer the query ne. IN SOA: Server 194.51.3.49 UDP port 53 answered REFUSED FAIL ne. ns-ne.afrinic.net. 2001:43f8:120:0:0:0:0:45 All nameservers failed to answer the query ne. IN SOA: Server 2001:43f8:120:0:0:0:0:45 UDP port 53 answered REFUSED FAIL pg. ns1.tiare.net.pg. 202.165.192.23 All nameservers failed to answer the query pg. IN SOA: Server 202.165.192.23 UDP port 53 answered SERVFAIL FAIL ss. b.ns.tznic.or.tz. 196.216.162.70 All nameservers failed to answer the query ss. IN SOA: Server 196.216.162.70 UDP port 53 answered SERVFAIL FAIL tg. ns1.admin.net. 198.73.186.1 All nameservers failed to answer the query tg. IN SOA: Server 198.73.186.1 UDP port 53 answered SERVFAIL FAIL ye. ns1.yemen.net.ye. 65.162.184.33 All nameservers failed to answer the query ye. IN SOA: Server 65.162.184.33 UDP port 53 answered SERVFAIL FAIL ye. ns2.yemen.net.ye. 65.162.184.34 All nameservers failed to answer the query ye. IN SOA: Server 65.162.184.34 UDP port 53 answered SERVFAIL There are 96 more that timed out but I can't tell whether they really aren't there or it's a temporary network issue. R's, John
- [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for la… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension fo… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension fo… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… John Kristoff
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… libor.peltan
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Magnus Sandberg
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension fo… John Kristoff
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension fo… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Joe Abley
- [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [E… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extens… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension fo… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks Mark Elkins
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Kim Davies
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re… Edward Lewis