IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 08 May 2023 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3DC13AE3D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2023 10:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="0JhDu2UD"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="izGqlMVI"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDvq8w5XIfUN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2023 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49EFC13AE37 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2023 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28662 invoked from network); 8 May 2023 17:13:26 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=6ff4.64592db6.k2305; bh=606hMLUda9C65yn3WYTqSX7h5qnjsium3+c1sqqHcNk=; b=0JhDu2UDTBvpT6aRC72/T3xKEdjK45rRfxwS2UPYRg6wTw9fH3cUYYdm9WIgF1NUrU23j/sJlfiZGQ7NOjSGrkYnzBJHt9AL4j7YbTMq6gIQc9+8j2BCWQjnKjrv4zHYkznD5GW66j4Kd/BduB9EnksT07O6Dp/jQCKacrsNgofQ+loheSPHY3b/0aeWMPd0nBq0IHM3exlwTM07DKz37wuiL9c5eCfSKnSrBr1hUOdzWKBx3h6RnWXCHywUrSqgvPSpCs7CIZtXZqS85mzbg9j0WViZw+6xiR8I6WW6HWFA/qyeRjIQ/2cG8OwDA1P27Rn/V2ovb6LUlGm+OXY74g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=6ff4.64592db6.k2305; bh=606hMLUda9C65yn3WYTqSX7h5qnjsium3+c1sqqHcNk=; b=izGqlMVIVIGNbm7vROfJKF9h1riuhuxtAANs+9XHgWIhUaQsDbUmDlqlL++Ng0PG1dAVLOZOpJRqzdujqC4WVIWPAxE12+YgD7GpbzqyEGF1lf1hKKOfEXuQlPEOh+XG37UaQg7LV5xsaS73tX9ZqrDJ9B9XaIm9DcG/r0I1rlUEGdjMtLtv6iSPncFPYGUavAKeJ/dtplZuTSCgE5Dm6NUxpYz9HMUM6Pr6BeWi+9loNxX1P+uTO2uBe6qEwEXXY5/Cds1WeocTjcw/2VETc3HxY/xQJ9nOUkkEF4lesyWazVofjvIp/i3AQSn8r0ogTXVHCxMzaQOcvCxAnNqxLw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 08 May 2023 17:13:25 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0616DD2FF5B0; Mon, 8 May 2023 13:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:13:24 -0400
Message-Id: <20230508171325.0616DD2FF5B0@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: kim.davies@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <ZFkjqbmf04Is8SJW@KIDA-9190.local>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lrXM3MNDOCWQspVWsuMR-AtIiIE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 17:13:34 -0000

It appears that Kim Davies  <kim.davies@iana.org> said:
>With that said, I think the root zone is probably not an instructive
>use case for the broader question. Unlike typical zones, at the root it
>can be said every delegation is to critical Internet infrastructure and
>therefore the calculus around process complexity and efficiency would be
>weighted differently.

Oh, I completely agree.  My point was just that even in the root which is small and you
would hope would change slowly, it's still a challenge to track what's lame.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email