IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]

Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> Sat, 06 May 2023 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <el@lisse.NA>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289ECC14CF1F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 11:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzMa6C6X3Dvu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 11:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fra.omadhina.net (fra.omadhina.net [80.240.31.104]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88DE0C15199D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 May 2023 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (aries.lisse.na [160.242.14.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by fra.omadhina.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26F857D010; Sat, 6 May 2023 18:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <2abfdd2d-baff-77f6-76b9-b6d0f40739fd@lisse.NA>
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 20:00:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Reply-To: el@lisse.NA
Cc: el@lisse.NA
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20230506155052.4A3C8CF9B318@ary.qy>
From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>
Organization: Dr Eberhard W Lisse
In-Reply-To: <20230506155052.4A3C8CF9B318@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/woBc_cydo66VKgv5BkLlPirNRXE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Delegation acceptance checks [was: Re: [Ext] WGLC rfc8499bis one week extension for lame delegation definition]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 18:00:33 -0000

The IANA Function Operator does so for all ccTLDs (which would imply
all TLDs).

el

On 06/05/2023 17:20, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Joe Abley  <jabley@strandkip.nl> said:
>> Pre-delegation checks add friction to the domain registration
>> process.  They further complicate the commuications between different
>> actors in the commercial graph (registrars, registries, resellers,
>> DNS operators, hosting companies) and introduce delay and manual
>> intervention into what might otherwise be a fairly automated or at
>> least automatable process.  ...
> 
> Thirty years ago, when you did domain registrations by e-mail, the
> registry which was then called Network Solutions did indeed check that
> your name servers were active before delegating the domain.  It was
> not an accident that they stopped doing so, and it seems vanishingly
> unlikely that any gTLD registry would do so now, regardless of what
> people here might think.

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse   \         /       Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
el@lisse.NA             / *      |  Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht  \      /  If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia           ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status