IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 25 October 2019 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF201208C9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpPVh31sl-i2 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3241208CA for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x9PEsPpv017776; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:54:25 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACCB22042; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:54:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DE822048; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:54:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.46.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x9PEsOph025456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:54:25 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <00c801d58a9a$53693c60$fa3bb520$@olddog.co.uk> <CB806045-0E5E-4445-A377-7CD547B9DD90@cisco.com> <010a01d58ac1$c0ab2320$42016960$@olddog.co.uk> <dc3bf13f-0178-8e4c-6680-ae3258ac1a9b@gmail.com> <587B859DB99BCB30198AF5AE@PSB> <17311.1572013829@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <17311.1572013829@localhost>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:54:25 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <01ef01d58b44$18700850$495018f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJAtSgmuKwIQAjILkVQZyHvzq+iagIHxZr9AuW8WQsA2EHq7AEh7kH9ATYSDhemVC6TcA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.46.229
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25002.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.502-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.502-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25002.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.502400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 6otD/cJAac3xIbpQ8BhdbEsh+mzT1UnbF4T0JlzLSMscNByoSo036a89 faQmUQh6VvBmMCR35iV4HFJnx/1IpUGpYFFdx/uzHPYwOJi6PLlH5VDE8rJHW4yGe0rn0HSbMd9 fjQeL3VnHqfFgv16WHE3u/l5U0Fua2Sh9JmuSOLj2b09s2KGDsOrJY73SWz9CVz8J52OVy+Q4dm LsI9aus8KfGx1okLtGDum4M15KOSysFsm/vCZrCcdsW8efjakth/D5Bj+ZsXhjyv+d0Z0OxYRqA m+6F8lY63BZ+u8CIN3KYyuHWz8bPE1+zyfzlN7y/sToY2qzpx4DOZGFGsyhFZmRrZ61J09L2Ayq vQSyt/fiRhduhvElspgtwixx9AosexXZk2/kayVMJ/pCqlHOPOUhmUhDsv3H2qyz6xRaOXXqdmw RCWwX1Vv7uW91gisTLvFkccZMuXeq/gFtvLOIEPknBY/tBFAS5D9smqVBD9yilnnVDECPd/H7Av sTxZMb7DafdH0+BI7qCyYebl7X7A==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/D0oM1yiKMMtE4czIWDcXfWJKdFY>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:54:39 -0000

Hi Michael,

I don't want to oppose your proposals to work on NomCom eligibility. In
fact, I encourage you and I hope we can get somewhere with it.

But, I feel you are overriding the discussion. You are welcome to say "I
think your problem is boring and I don't want to work on it," but why should
that stop others from completing a small piece of work with an incremental
improvement?

Thanks,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> 
Sent: 25 October 2019 15:30
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; adrian@olddog.co.uk;
eligibility-discuss@ietf.org; 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall
petitions


John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
    > Brian, keep in mind that we are talking about petitioners here,
    > not the recall committee.

Tweaking the list for petitions for a process that effectively never gets
used is boring.  It's not worth the RFC.

If we are going to do something, let's find a way to enfrachise (fully)
people in category (b).

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks
[
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect
[
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails
[

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email