IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B4B120949 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jvo4DJiuVk2m for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56492120942 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14917; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1572017448; x=1573227048; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=yPdTLhPll/t6b37uwmBzIg6C4I7gW0awozwJB22K58k=; b=I4a7i/T7pzP05MrQ8NyMquD5hPgTFrXi7ov7eRfG7PfVC+Op4qNkcgq/ H0J41B9vot0ykr820OvAq6RVzU3PWJMPg3pyqAxc64CnoJjCqSwv8C9iS 7oWVvqWN2tUDXmbYk4XIcEcpxP8jQ3rbj7HalmCZITlkGndLmPXdCmSUi c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALAACAFLNd/xbLJq1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgWcEAQEBAQELAYEbgXBUIBIqjExgh2clh02LV4YPgXsCBwEBAQkDAQEYAQoMAQGDe0UCg2M0CQ4CAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYU3DIVRAQEBAgEBAWwLBQsLPwcnHxEGE4MiAYJXIA+xSoInhU6EaxCBNgGBUopUgX+BOAwTgkw+gmIBAYUjgiwEljWXMIIugjOBE5FnG44YizukdIMUAgQGBQIVgVI5gVgzGggbFTsqAYJBCTUSEBSLUjuFQT8DMJAvAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,229,1569283200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="18433988"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 Oct 2019 15:30:46 +0000
Received: from [10.61.195.187] ([10.61.195.187]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9PFUii6025769 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:30:46 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <221A73D0-7AFB-4945-A8BC-1101B9425122@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D591FD37-4A04-4B73-B039-35D7585F5D29"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:30:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <B0B0A84A-D47D-475E-B37F-B6D9524A7D64@episteme.net>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
References: <00c801d58a9a$53693c60$fa3bb520$@olddog.co.uk> <CB806045-0E5E-4445-A377-7CD547B9DD90@cisco.com> <010a01d58ac1$c0ab2320$42016960$@olddog.co.uk> <dc3bf13f-0178-8e4c-6680-ae3258ac1a9b@gmail.com> <865BF4B8-CB57-4586-8C2E-34B5218E53E2@episteme.net> <8D2605D0-33F0-4ED3-A063-A3F1469F3685@cisco.com> <B0B0A84A-D47D-475E-B37F-B6D9524A7D64@episteme.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.195.187, [10.61.195.187]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/GzAcuNESEU8LLbM_T0Wk8xfxn2g>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:30:50 -0000

Hi Pete,

> 
> Eliot, you misunderstood my question and Adrian's original mitigation proposal:
> 

Sorry.  A few messages flying back and forth.

> Stick with SM's original proposal.
> 
> Add the requirement that there must be X people on the petition who meets the current rules (attended 3/5 physical meetings).
> 
> Would that allay your concern?


I do not know how to solve for X.  That would be my only concern.

Eliot

> 
> pr
> --
> Pete Resnick http://www.episteme.net/ <http://www.episteme.net/>
> All connections to the world are tenuous at best
> 
> --
> Eligibility-discuss mailing list
> Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email