IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898D7120949 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPh_WCVgPTPH for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0342E120902 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id t8so4007954qtc.6 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=0BPE0TUc6VWx8PZwzgJ+/EY56z2dSpI+KsdJV93amjY=; b=mBviaAxeaBKchgWBAOIO+8Dh+S9XdMvhoRE1gWLM9S1zp3OLze/imrlEIp1INi0OQF qa8ZiWE6I1VK+maFuIzRXOVvW/NV3InU9RfQ6WRb3nrhYZ8dR5jm6EGKYdMHR9kSXQ6l IbkADioZAx064CFqSIiuldRHGO29bkVN6qFm5S7g+k+2lb7alutgN8hrW97lnfIpnhDX j5EhBXN9yh0Si3HTg68rYU5HYGZbP4fa5rop6VvSq4deFT41AcwTY4Vc5N1F2n9VhVcw QvIvPj8NpzZ55oSr6da+GPvegVQJgBekRBfqXtUrMwtqTPnXDDZDXfIBU3Xk1UBj2iJt csRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=0BPE0TUc6VWx8PZwzgJ+/EY56z2dSpI+KsdJV93amjY=; b=WXKCdoUThIr07jfJa2MwRUF/XEam4764x240CSbnnco6Uk1+l50UiJ1YrmjWjXIKhN px4h2PwWfOO5ODyzTcbKVZ7tqmPXRd03LM26jYFoCr8kb5ykP+93WAxFu66Cc69Szs6X aOdJuTgRUttrWWT7JBrmnnwJHVYTukyBiOcGwdiknCKIO9MycWBq63QMgzU8WrzG8ffN e4zeDPUsMjDl9CWCKfcF3YPMCJhoFdAFMhdkdXOO17qALAo2LOKRgJlYKWBt/eE/uH7D 7tOoogodikGrGcO7q6kzuIy1nJ6rEVHJRAJ89jqrJ/j3ME2Hn6bybDIlySD8IgSNkOVn R+Jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUdJNZ+QuwHdNvsiQ686TyqyMhJoHjbDn+OYFaAX+I+rqdOyS13 ZKpKu6p1+hO8XmCHVEXap7k+6sTxEgs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeRDmrtEs7BQXHjudEt7eraQ8cKk8KZ3dePQBNsPBxDjSj1IiybdU+Lln4hQ3bk4Hv0s1r2Q==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:24af:: with SMTP id t44mr3646669qtc.57.1572019534772; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:1d4:9d46:3bef:90f4? ([2601:152:4400:437c:1d4:9d46:3bef:90f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z193sm388084qkb.12.2019.10.25.09.05.33 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <00c801d58a9a$53693c60$fa3bb520$@olddog.co.uk> <CB806045-0E5E-4445-A377-7CD547B9DD90@cisco.com> <010a01d58ac1$c0ab2320$42016960$@olddog.co.uk> <CB7198FC-294A-4F5E-A57F-49333DD8C56E@cisco.com> <017a01d58b1d$9e5969b0$db0c3d10$@olddog.co.uk> <2D6F641A-CED0-4C35-A72E-D4BDC48F457C@cisco.com> <CAL02cgSo3yQe7ZBiV_ZT4qNw7ApZt8t5yY7viwAW7xvhS31hsw@mail.gmail.com> <01b701d58b3a$ab943ac0$02bcb040$@olddog.co.uk> <4d0eee54-6ece-5e5f-16fc-8ee5906a241c@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <59232265-6295-0b54-2c7a-7f310a9539b9@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:05:32 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4d0eee54-6ece-5e5f-16fc-8ee5906a241c@nthpermutation.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4E2E549F5D39B9284399A3D7"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/aYh-W24ykIY3OLjKaD1aZIwmD2U>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:05:38 -0000

On 10/25/2019 11:47 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 10/25/2019 9:46 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>
>> Nicely said, Richard. And to be fair to Eliot, he started off trying 
>> to qualify a number of ways of counting participation.
>>
> Actually, I don't think I completely agree with Richard's taxonomy.   
> Yes the IESG has impact on the set of people Richard listed, but the 
> IAB - not so much,, and the LLC even less so - at least directly.
>
Sorry for replying to my own post, but I had a "eureka" moment after 
reflecting on the last sentence above.

Why not have two nomcoms - one for the IESG (minus the IETF chair), and 
one for everything else.   The nomcom for the IESG could be open to 
remote participants while the other nomcom could use the current 
eligibility requirements.

It would also reduce some of the time commitments of any given Nomcom 
participant by splitting the load.

Later, Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email