[Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.3

Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com> Sat, 23 October 2004 20:44 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA21198 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:44:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLSxw-0003nQ-4q for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:58:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLSgj-0001k3-BQ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:40:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLSdC-00019V-30 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:36:54 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA20991 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from znx208-2-156-007.znyx.com ([] helo=lotus.znyx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLSqI-0003h4-I7 for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:50:26 -0400
Received: from [] ([]) by lotus.znyx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2004102313392355:39243 ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:39:23 -0700
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>
To: avri@psg.com
In-Reply-To: <CE5A3946-252D-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579210@orsmsx408> <1E526654-24BF-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com> <417A23E6.7010504@zurich.ibm.com> <005b01c4b907$242b1790$020aa8c0@wwm1> <417AA8B6.1040601@zurich.ibm.com> <1098558745.1097.42.camel@jzny.localdomain> <CE5A3946-252D-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Organization: ZNYX Networks
Message-Id: <1098563810.1096.93.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: 23 Oct 2004 16:36:50 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/23/2004 01:39:23 PM, Serialize by Router on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/23/2004 01:39:24 PM, Serialize complete at 10/23/2004 01:39:24 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.3
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@znyx.com
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

section 6.3

And in general i hope those are seen as sample layouts of the message;
i.e hopefully, nobody sees that layout as the way they must build the
message with an ADD and a DEL etc.

- 6.3.1  Config Message

+ "Config data"   should be "Config data and path"

+ Type is bad to describe operations. That should be operations

+ UPDATE/REPLACE, DEL ALL are really flag extensions which will become
clear once we have path-data noise cleared. Suggest you remove.


- 6.3.2  Config Response Message

Why do we have " Operation Result "
As far as i can see it is sufficient to look at the Main header type,
a operation, path and its associated data.
Unless this is meant to be a less verbose result?

+ BTW, what is the point of mentioning "single or Array LFB
       specific result entries" or result might be TLV. Just say the 
presentation of the data is stuill under discussion.


Forces-protocol mailing list