Re: [Ianaplan] CWG draft and its impact on the IETF

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

John C & John C, :-)

>> Without either of those two kinds of
>> information, I do have an opinion about impact and risks to the
>> IETF, and have expressed it before, I think in my first note on
>> the subject: this is too complex, it introduces new risks of
>> non-transparent behavior that may be accountable to small groups
>> but is not even as accountable to the broader community as
>> ICANN's operation of IANA is today, and therefore should not be
>> considered acceptable.  
> 
> John -
> 
> You do not consider IETF's MOU for IANA services sufficient to 
> mitigate the risks associated with the CWG proposal? It would 
> be very useful for this community to understand what risks you 
> believe are not addressed by the present RFC 2860 MOU...

For what it is worth, I agree with the latter John. The important
part is our interface, and our ability to deal with any problems
that might occur. 

Jari