[Idr] 回复: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

"jasonlu(陆素建)" <jasonlu@tencent.com> Thu, 23 July 2020 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jasonlu@tencent.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F673A0A66 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tencent.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2OIz_JT5n38 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.tencent.com (mail1.tencent.com [203.205.248.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AB03A0A64 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX-SZ020.tencent.com (unknown [10.28.6.40]) by mail1.tencent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37785A125 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:37:14 +0800 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tencent.com; s=s202002; t=1595493434; bh=nr6jZrIFRIkTFH3sTDgYW5xbbRA7zeYwLDikO4keYMM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=V+AFDxtnRmAN7dUYeyR411o3gOABXEUeXAsLoF6Egl5giLFH3sr+BKccK9qYP1V07 SBiq6aZT//ieuuuc1tJLEddMnyG8u9MgnGMKMf8cKfVA8qgNnzz6Ak8VmI4TYb9nIj xXmeTJytP86Lp6/xSxPvQud3KE5E6nJNqyWEgYa0=
Received: from EX-SZ006.tencent.com (10.28.6.30) by EX-SZ020.tencent.com (10.28.6.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:37:14 +0800
Received: from EX-SZ013.tencent.com (10.28.6.37) by EX-SZ006.tencent.com (10.28.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:37:14 +0800
Received: from EX-SZ013.tencent.com ([fe80::a1d1:21f:18e9:e533]) by EX-SZ013.tencent.com ([fe80::a1d1:21f:18e9:e533%8]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.007; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:37:14 +0800
From: "jasonlu(陆素建)" <jasonlu@tencent.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
Thread-Index: AdZaqFM+IHByNV2FRBK1MLVtR2zN/AGIr51A
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:37:14 +0000
Message-ID: <7a13811501114417a572564a89c492d4@tencent.com>
References: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.28.2.32]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7a13811501114417a572564a89c492d4tencentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/8Gm5LzpJ0sGJ9JqxordnCrTGpEo>
Subject: [Idr] 回复: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:37:20 -0000

Hi Everyone,

I support the WGLC of the draft.
Reponses inline with [Jasonlu].


发件人: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> 代表 Susan Hares
发送时间: 2020年7月15日 21:11
收件人: idr@ietf.org
主题: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd
from 7/15 to 7/29/2020.  You can obtain this draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rpd/

This draft defines a new AFI/SAFI and new atoms
for the Wide Communities.  This WG LC has been delayed
as I waited for a resubmission of the Wide Communities draft.
I had hoped to do these 2 WG LC in parallel.

I’ve not received the Wide Communities draft, but we will
start this WGLC to provide feedback to the authors.
We may have to run a short follow-up to this WG LC
If there are changes to the Wide Communities draft during
Its WG LC.

There is an IPR statement on this draft.

In your responses please answer the following questions:

1) Do you feel this draft has an solution that is acceptable
   With the IPR as a WG RFC?

2) Do you feel this draft is ready to publish?

3) Do you know of implementations of this draft?

4) Do you know of deployments of this draft?
If so, is this feature useful in the deploy ments.

5) Do you feel that Wide Communities is ready for
Publication?

Cheerily, Susan Hares