Re: [Idr] [GROW] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 25 July 2020 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24963A0B3B; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SF8s9bcuhIHd; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626A83A0B3A; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jzS9O-0007hV-Pg; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 21:56:14 +0000
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:56:14 -0700
Message-ID: <m2sgdfnts1.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMELaeQripOj8fG0hUi+WMw2pCDN8oA93nMLNGkE1mUE+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB2768FA084068B2AC594FCF9F9A760@MN2PR13MB2768.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR13MB2334C4D7D54DE9D8F12F687E85760@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR11MB32077F59F573D8A129EFB02AC0760@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR13MB23346310695F957202320F2885760@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR11MB3207A5A462FEE0CC07551943C0760@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR13MB2334ED45BF23645D1AAE56E485770@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMELaeQripOj8fG0hUi+WMw2pCDN8oA93nMLNGkE1mUE+w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KvOexiRyfzBe_dtvTF9X2xy_ThQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 21:56:22 -0000

> As said before and as reiterated by Jakob and Ketan BGP is not the
> right tool for p2p config push. We must stop adding such extensions to
> BGP like this one or BGP-LS or SR Policies if we really want to keep
> routing at some proper stability levels.

just in case folk missed the last time i agreed with this sentiment,

+1

randy