Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

Donald Eastlake <> Wed, 29 July 2020 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CE53A0EED for <>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNncWZmQIUFz for <>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9A53A0ECE for <>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id z6so22975638iow.6 for <>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ekJyjejcY8J3biJYiBUgFMgYOzTrVfwXdiQf0cM6ww0=; b=JQbdlLJrzLDSW710/lbZ767exwF6UcdfWe/S/srDcWqjggvrinaMGaNv5USNJv5BVu gs2c8YH0aNF+HQUl/rmowE53QWKNT1gB6GktHohLFNkEXawVKTMnZyqgUj5CeniIHNNs +ILbvfmIa/nwPO3WoE0NpBSLzyWii1IObekupUWciso+lmGfkblsNtt1wH3Z2LhlfUSd peDmPWi5ZOq4fLyBmL/nRCUPDK8OZkaZMBXuCpsW+O2G2rsu09RZOiqxTOuvNRipf4EP 5U3K9R0z9S7qNAdJyQlVVnqLyD7+KPAbEaArD45IBON2WFWjQKWdzBYxBAu5VN1Y7l5X Ap/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ekJyjejcY8J3biJYiBUgFMgYOzTrVfwXdiQf0cM6ww0=; b=CHzjTvOM4LKuRb1v3bt0/ur/oLJYIlq3xjxuo3zJ0DmRdSQ0yfPUAZiCjXCXeHXRWI 9OoNBqUOvOPnghIOfxRagPWxBWm5etIqGUkqv9ToK3rBPEj+/of9P0rnvw1siR7/S3Tu vKkoEmX4Vo2gsxXSlLcSAJPWrRQbRz/aK6vQcEa/Vi16dKjqrfDIAITA8p0wZ4nZqmb1 k84LYfjmkxZswqeOB9HduMJ+WHGugwCuQVIN6TCRYPEjgS5oSvevRT+fjPnHNAHdZRgR JebRcq8Q5QIB9sp+Yur/9JBZRC+1XNlGMXl6awpjGKj5dKwUMMb790ZfK2N38mT526zM nCYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bWCed5LrdSne50fCY2hPL3IfOyVRjTEX6yl1l1C58jOk2QUlP 11bRvFk+JhlMX/p2JxLrhRgpp1x/MH30KzF12JySVLIa9b8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx79scCAGVMwS1yX9vCbOIVbvzgNckgQBUkTSbYuHvnIHuOLpUG3DPsg5bHP6hmDSxMV2ZKQK/OaMpOIKkW7EY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:771:: with SMTP id y17mr35676008jad.96.1595988701223; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$>
In-Reply-To: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$>
From: Donald Eastlake <>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:11:29 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: Susan Hares <>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:11:46 -0000


I've read the draft and all the comments so far. See answers to the
questions below.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 9:11 AM Susan Hares <> wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd
> from 7/15 to 7/29/2020.  You can obtain this draft at:
> This draft defines a new AFI/SAFI and new atoms
> for the Wide Communities.  This WG LC has been delayed
> as I waited for a resubmission of the Wide Communities draft.
> I had hoped to do these 2 WG LC in parallel.
> I’ve not received the Wide Communities draft, but we will
> start this WGLC to provide feedback to the author
> We may have to run a short follow-up to this WG LC
> If there are changes to the Wide Communities draft during
> Its WG LC.
> There is an IPR statement on this draft.
> In your responses please answer the following questions:
> 1) Do you feel this draft has an solution that is acceptable
>    With the IPR as a WG RFC?

Given the existing implementations/deployments and that it has a
separate AFI/SAFI, I am supportive of the idea.

> 2) Do you feel this draft is ready to publish?

I believe the draft needs some more work. It does not seem complete.
It also has some editorial problems. I am in the process of doing an
editorial review to send to the authors.

If this draft were progressed now, I think the directorate, shepherd,
etc., reviews would call for significant additions/changes.

> 3) Do you know of implementations of this draft?
> 4) Do you know of deployments of this draft?

I am not personally involved but there are implementations and
deployments as listed by others.

 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 33896 USA

> If so, is this feature useful in the deploy ments.
> 5) Do you feel that Wide Communities is ready for
> Publication?
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list