IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

tony.li@tony.li Tue, 28 July 2020 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E7E3A09C7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEv5JSNgN4Lo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D243A07E8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id k71so805314pje.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=h9M6C08xk9/2G0ar+hmP/K1iPwkaHFiMZ8nHUPunhQI=; b=PdOC+cZX8ZXd9d12oV/nyWfbxyGjE/+DnqokbMxbavv52fT0r680YiN49GU6PCjeKF rkL/kzCEUY+h8oRHb7XKtiTYLCq72aygHyXsaPYqTgjRCnw0xkJECh+l11xknLSzF+mY QZKtM7QBAKm5r8efyZ7KJHKuLn7hL/10HFTg+K801dkh5r5CUYjfXHCKbVH3faKIHxNX I1JuUyZ93UD/kbA3rq22N7Ch3pDOoYSf9pKJciD9nU7+iIbMY/iY1RU0la73LYpRddVU QBk0EG5k/AU7HK3zk22fap0rFScmfoByM1JVudOntQ/7Eil6+1RE+CDumMGxRmJVa2R0 oasg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=h9M6C08xk9/2G0ar+hmP/K1iPwkaHFiMZ8nHUPunhQI=; b=PTo7iOSbFQC6dG4Ei4xYDg5OPX3Fah5hxmhGq3+KBC2cxdKktBSXZ/+NeBnswGasJ5 9DkaxGOk3TuGW0269Y/Gms+zi2ougTXWrZxiQ59Y9W8z76zPV+LcJQE4cXrbaDmkgEgX hw0XGbbWtE4kMtXxdBAXA1EUkacwSwUVdzux2k9Fm0SPYvEl+3NxlyYHAJNQus8p9Ptt 3AbM3+QTtKY6doUVJ7y8jjbS2VrAVFtgYxNk1/gh4i3Ul4gGqokueOncrgnNzbT1s+I/ u98lhgorehfYnXULcvc39mFERBoGV/o48grjI7GJ68v8XcgDy4q9xp9mRbcprarWnY+B 7TTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mb4O8H3eO1K1QwWNbBvW4rivzL4oHJxug8kqr7DL22bVhZW3Y DhSLuPsaeh6+dgcRkt2pFgujaoYb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUJwGpDvP1LaSrw9SsO1t9wUyXYWkTil/VbWjrRzyuJr1ENstheqn+7TyiKB851eUCI434rQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9e7:: with SMTP id 94mr6287066pjo.97.1595974493729; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.81.134] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4sm35766pgn.64.2020.07.28.15.14.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: tony.li@tony.li
Message-Id: <F0AE1AEC-FDF5-4C1C-A639-C983EC98A450@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_79FC0A7B-86A8-4128-B551-69E9F40907ED"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:49 -0700
In-Reply-To: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
References: <003701d65aa9$689a64d0$39cf2e70$@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yUSrHFPi48urn96_NKsXj_o5Cz4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:15:00 -0000

Hi Sue,

1) No
2) No
3) No
4) No
5) Abstain

I object to this draft for the same reason that many others have already stated.  BGP is not a dump truck. BGP is not a configuration tool. Policy distribution should be done through Netconf/YANG, not via BGP. BGP is not a transport protocol, nor a peer-to-peer distribute database. Yes, you could do all of these things, but that doesn’t make it right.  You could also put things in DNS. That would also be wrong.

If you feel the need for a generic distributed database, please feel free to design one.  But not inside of BGP. That would be wrong.

Regards,
Tony Li, Ph.D.
Arista Networks
co-editor, RFC 4271




> On Jul 15, 2020, at 6:11 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd 
> from 7/15 to 7/29/2020.  You can obtain this draft at: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rpd/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rpd/>
>  
> This draft defines a new AFI/SAFI and new atoms 
> for the Wide Communities.  This WG LC has been delayed 
> as I waited for a resubmission of the Wide Communities draft.  
> I had hoped to do these 2 WG LC in parallel. 
>  
> I’ve not received the Wide Communities draft, but we will 
> start this WGLC to provide feedback to the authors. 
> We may have to run a short follow-up to this WG LC
> If there are changes to the Wide Communities draft during 
> Its WG LC. 
>  
> There is an IPR statement on this draft.
>  
> In your responses please answer the following questions: 
>  
> 1) Do you feel this draft has an solution that is acceptable 
>    With the IPR as a WG RFC?  
>  
> 2) Do you feel this draft is ready to publish?
>  
> 3) Do you know of implementations of this draft?  
>  
> 4) Do you know of deployments of this draft?  
> If so, is this feature useful in the deploy ments. 
>  
> 5) Do you feel that Wide Communities is ready for 
> Publication?  
>  
> Cheerily, Susan Hares   
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email