Re: [Idr] 答复: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)

> If wide communities has been abandoned

It has not been abandoned. We were waiting for more implementations -
that's all.

Thx.
R.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 3:44 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Everyone
>
> There has been a lot of concern related to this draft after being adopted
> in 2019 and not having much feedback till now on WGLC.
>
> I agree with Ketan’s comments that it is two early for WGLC as their are
> significant questions and concerns that need to be addressed before we can
> proceed any further.
>
> A question was raised as is this an NMS function similar to BGP flowspec
> and if so then netconf and Yang already provides that solution.
>
> For SR we already have a centralized PCE controller based policy push that
> utilizes BGP LS to gather path information from the IGP for path steering.
>
> This draft seems to be reinventing a wheel that has been invented.
>
> 1) Do you feel this draft has an solution that is acceptable
>
>    With the IPR as a WG RFC?  No
>
>
>
> 2) Do you feel this draft is ready to publish? No
>
>
>
> 3) Do you know of implementations of this draft? No
>
>
>
> 4) Do you know of deployments of this draft?  No
>
> If so, is this feature useful in the deploy ments.
>
>
>
> 5) Do you feel that Wide Communities is ready for
>
> Publication?
>
> From the data tracker for wide communities the draft was adopted but since
> has expired.  The RPD draft is hinged on publication of wide communities.
> If wide communities has been abandoned I think that would impact this draft.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities/
>
> My suggestion as others have stated is to not proceed with this document
> on WGLC and have further discussion if agreed to analyze how this draft
> fills a gap that exist today given the current solutions we have today with
> NMS Yang and Netconf as well as existing centralized PCE controller based
> solution for SR-TE policy push.
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Gyan
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Ou Liang <ouliang@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>>     I support the WGLC of the draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Liang Ou as a co-author
>>
>>
>>
>> *发件人:* Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] *代表 *Susan Hares
>> *发送时间:* 2020年7月15日 21:11
>>
>> *收件人:* idr@ietf.org
>> *主题:* [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt (7/15 to 7/29/2020)
>>
>>
>>
>> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rpd
>>
>> from 7/15 to 7/29/2020.  You can obtain this draft at:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rpd/
>>
>>
>>
>> This draft defines a new AFI/SAFI and new atoms
>>
>> for the Wide Communities.  This WG LC has been delayed
>>
>> as I waited for a resubmission of the Wide Communities draft.
>>
>> I had hoped to do these 2 WG LC in parallel.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve not received the Wide Communities draft, but we will
>>
>> start this WGLC to provide feedback to the authors.
>>
>> We may have to run a short follow-up to this WG LC
>>
>> If there are changes to the Wide Communities draft during
>>
>> Its WG LC.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is an IPR statement on this draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> In your responses please answer the following questions:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) Do you feel this draft has an solution that is acceptable
>>
>>    With the IPR as a WG RFC?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2) Do you feel this draft is ready to publish?
>>
>>
>>
>> 3) Do you know of implementations of this draft?
>>
>>
>>
>> 4) Do you know of deployments of this draft?
>>
>> If so, is this feature useful in the deploy ments.
>>
>>
>>
>> 5) Do you feel that Wide Communities is ready for
>>
>> Publication?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>