IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 15 February 2021 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C8B3A11A0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:31:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Du-NXMZfDY-a for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F6A3A119E for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id q14so9565633ljp.4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v/UGBE6kaNBCYAQcWV7UJsmYSEidTCGNO9FMJCELpts=; b=XcbpIHuzKCt7MbuOzZz3pXS9LKlwaOIzR4g9YQMUWI8KbYF9CNeIDnA+RQnCmhag1c /8cFJIJjvNKn7wW07Lk6Q254Qe9dQs71HxtCX7A+/nysprmOksbYI0Q39EqvdA8aIRxb q/sWOr+mcwQVjFTDi87B7up/TTwBvvNs/oHMn5+88RATCcaPx8IbXgI9octmjQWG3MFm kXRTQdRxBSTNAqE5oLmrGc6e+cmil1OcPdAG1RHGyXbs2IN+suRg9Gzg9eFWPFYVIf4V 6AjXeJLtLy5zbq2ehZ2KyQcKa6JdHrGAs/cDZ8ffVyIiny2+G3kgMSWKMqwGXRKjBnR5 gIXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v/UGBE6kaNBCYAQcWV7UJsmYSEidTCGNO9FMJCELpts=; b=oYD4Y+irt0sODh+rt0ZW6fK5auCRlnaGueptKWRI4lI1V3cmu/nBCnHxe5NoUmmwmn Hjc7m25VcqlJ0dDRCO6hpbilzMZuAX1vzIGVyYBizkK2OfLHHWF0FLwgf6GKODyySo+G huPazEoNi3KIEOFAr6ygyA9QfU2AlrAN7TgWOAMPlHzurjpTX1pxZvZ1Xs10qxBo2sm8 bFvwvbdb9qAQK6vQZWrOEgBJv/pUyX2XjXMHtqeABBUTs0txs19DlgKUkXaImhRso2/v 1uNWP3tXYZmJLAHqji4X2CqwkbFkPLgCSrMKAoHdb+dcXMMgE3ZjqQqZDo0bLTQ6nBpf EHIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/uxxXIrBrUYP+FqDVC+335hhFwyicGNkvVyEz7akSu+LZcgsb Bn1bHvOvv6bcWoOgpnDjruqL3Q68s20c4moFT3VqV3lt/fo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRUio0v5OV1KiENMpx5rg5yKA7Ox2Y2wP6ZVGCEJ0n6wwU3ss/CBXTQ6EaFm/lksjcyCh7S6bZSsga0/o7u7Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:390d:: with SMTP id g13mr10389154lja.23.1613424683186; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:31:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOj+MMEbp3JtC9Mh4Uf6g2VPFbCmkrEuXQdd8C70J88XesTOUg@mail.gmail.com> <250BB47C-8DC3-4CBD-9574-CDF5A39E18F1@tsinghua.org.cn> <BYAPR11MB32074D07524472026F6E1E62C0889@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <MW4PR02MB739409FC055CBA1EB54ADA8DC6889@MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR02MB739409FC055CBA1EB54ADA8DC6889@MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:31:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFb5LRHqhqcoBfzwv=3NAScFCPFFKEYB1zhgQVwA84P7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
Cc: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d179605bb66b590"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AICQtC_Rf4uD_61L63W7ShfIoUc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:31:27 -0000

Jim,

And quite frankly I think you nailed it.

If one is to provide a service he better purchase the right gear for it.

Not some weak PEs which balance on the cliff of falling under light wind
...

- - -

Mitigations which are deployed in many networks have been suggested.
Protect from issue not allow it to happen then try to patch it.

Alternative deployment models have been proposed too.

Sorry I do not buy the reason stated that mistaken redistribution of the
Internet to the VPN will crash the network. Right gear carries Internet in
a VRF just fine. And if it crashes ... so be it. Next time folks touching
PEs will be more careful.

I also do not accept as a reason Inter-AS option B or C. If you do not
trust your AS peer do A+B or A.

For me this topic is considered closed.

Thx,
Robert.


On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:15 PM UTTARO, JAMES <ju1738@att.com> wrote:

> *Here is another fact.. *
>
>
>
> *It is more like 10+ Million without an issue.*
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *              Jim Uttaro*
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email