IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-05.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 15 August 2022 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6FC14F744 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqqVIlc87zXm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974B7C14F718 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35EE11E2F7; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:49:53 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C1409D1-6DC3-4E1C-BDEA-FB22E987F646"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV29kyL_JF3CdXEJj9BWD=9pg1Z1J8tYyZ5UgJo2LFR5fA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:49:52 -0400
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <8CB11AF3-AFE0-4A3B-B8E6-C0AD62B9A937@pfrc.org>
References: <165920076221.43110.14224170878306367770@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMFGGcC19MJ4poutfp_C-=14RjQeNQXgc24vHyXoQsdZLNq5PQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV0b6ODL8u+VG8aYLRD9vQxwupYQT5DL0wBfZoOx-oCsZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2v4h2Sr_jKOUPsr-jdq-SbpD7xOLsazZC8zT3J3os_Ow@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFxHoZ8=gsF3bHho+CRp3XPo4=2WSp_jAvWSXzFzOr74Q@mail.gmail.com> <Yvo2FEBH6tM3ttKd@diehard.n-r-g.com> <CAOj+MMGTQSOYbd6g55vquzBoE2EEGMu4QSMDpYSTWvFhX4+BHg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEm8Q11M35gp=m2pMjnQ_RnQ4S_Otx4wugwx03QRPDvCzMWcyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEdWr4mnp0Cr9QSQ+Msfb6jHwziu=ttPGhdXUrtgtZqBw@mail.gmail.com> <Yvp3eZ4iDccWNmIR@shrubbery.net> <CAOj+MMFkotZAggSwf64pL0ZxYeDjd_sWpSH2sFZEMhgLnQNS1w@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV29kyL_JF3CdXEJj9BWD=9pg1Z1J8tYyZ5UgJo2LFR5fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/myNL_EblpMlkwNUVUs6denryB0U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-05.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:49:59 -0000

Gyan,

> On Aug 15, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>     The BGP Slow peer solution was never standardized and so Cisco is the only vendor with this option.  So that is still a gap that maybe worth standardization.
> 
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/119000-technote-bgp-00.html <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/119000-technote-bgp-00.html>
> The feature uses time stamps to detect the slow peer as well as table version and then puts the peer in a slow peer group.  Maybe a similar detection mechanism could be used to detect the zero window.
> 

Juniper doesn't implement its BGP using versioned tables and doesn't have this problem.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email