IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Proposal for variant language subtags for Pe̍h-ōe-jī romanization for Minnan (nan)

Winston Sung <winston21.sung@gmail.com> Sat, 10 February 2024 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <winston21.sung@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6CFC14F5EC for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvMi6ZNRjM5d for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.mail.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDBDC14F5E0 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) by MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:53 -0800
Received: from aesmt112-va-1-2.serverpod.net (10.216.74.35) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:53 -0800
Received: from aesc112-va-1-2.serverpod.net (aesc112-va-1-2.serverpod.net [10.216.76.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aesmt112-va-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB1D60002 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exmx112-va-1-1.serverpod.net (exmx112-va-1-1.serverpod.net [10.216.72.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aesmt112-va-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E97A0003 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pechora3.dc.icann.org (pechora3.icann.org [192.0.46.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by east.smtp.mx.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0603780002 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pechora3.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCCD07000608 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 05:29:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bbbc6e51d0so1077569b6e.3 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 21:29:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707542972; x=1708147772; darn=iana.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ViMmiChw3o9d+eZCh7kzPe2VsgCoKoQcdmgLB9kP75k=; b=hkTUPddlK4W3WJkRFGpdzN0oE/hP3nQ8b/QsYRjYR9KEPL/1FdMzHCEM6BNNJGjchg 3FyoAld5NoOO+SFpY7ySwgf3H+c7FyxbHAmScjiakIiqTpOYL9HD9ff5Fyk55ibR2oL0 WIHXHIXpCLbufya/T7avyeV2UzJoqbsviGZgAkoYDe6SXtJLptHtmihwg6monyvdgsbj HsTGusPts7OCrDtzZl2SdX5Y8A/GdwMKw5oAZymAHfPtOWTpRcc4Y6yOtYRqSo9nC/ks u5MmCpqo0ydA0Cdofv+jUy3H9WtgwqkQ0i8e8IOCBQDOGc4Wzn35X3KL4GTOMKfKIhrv Ljkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707542972; x=1708147772; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ViMmiChw3o9d+eZCh7kzPe2VsgCoKoQcdmgLB9kP75k=; b=LwKjc/A8x8Ii/bKpn78BkbhPuoaoKf98IaO8on4EiAvEswrwgRcQ7RAJ5a6tULWUw7 +zBl//8QdOGyH0RtTM+ELjYkym6jnkg1dmObeEF0YNUGx90zZcwG8l+gPOqv587KANIK GNebVX0v6E0/qVFaV0lFGc06sQI2RuriKaBCiLceMXxrzzfqv2sBhQ9QAVBd/HtNwKFv qksNooKtOSERR9mw7y4j81B7pWo8tMRuHs65CJntXpmO7cqFf3mdMPe6lf9g69jiYvIg 0q5x7bS7uGub7TqpIvqUgVKfSX8w9KuyhZi35zxBRq2r+gcQib1Ye05e+ChopgxDUKCA 8CSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyjrlgXfTBo0WyNigWKcVxLC16Rfq1nGOKnMweW/syNFyyHLy1A eb6ucVGGpkJShXXCSL+Y0m7N14Kap4SH374oB0ngfhSB2VvRNtW2NZAKuvAsHnx0mqKgdWCuz93 DTct4knph3U/d+JVqGxzFeMEGsuvBFkVGEOM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvURDvONHWeRbQNMDw/33PC12x2i/ULL3+YC6qjngWFTu6f2KHOU1VkyXHrXxMqJqJvvCiXSaWknjTE5io5pc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:c7:b0:3bf:fdb2:c9d1 with SMTP id t7-20020a05680800c700b003bffdb2c9d1mr1104523oic.17.1707542971893; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 21:29:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGxbZ4=j5wpHQZxNp7YccuV9zV1QN2eYOx3tymFEq2CzFnY-1g@mail.gmail.com> <SJ0PR03MB659886BC35F6D791CD648F47CA702@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAGxbZ4nPnmNG0bMKZhhutQCndVdcN7MGS_A6MM4QDAzPbxmvZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxbZ4nmpU3UFia9B8C_3jU3Uy8E=QKv9e3giQ4agcK26v9qOA@mail.gmail.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598D89C676C01B7CC58D88ECA7F2@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAGHjPPLbhsejJBP9iyMD5ChSy6OrZVYUnb4ZSALEKxa4ANckgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxbZ4kue_yUp7YSsEL20NYo1yaLCBoCK14SQG95dY0thWwcfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxbZ4=q-vWtkUXWf7TF3XAN6wguLipqWhU0jooAjj05xvkmsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE=3Ky8qxjPy4SALtzrWfKSNwYeZ7RFGpwZxYi8wuYCR+nDVtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxbZ4kY3cE9A6-XpCdy3eME9q1oA2ND+WKbDLVeJYcdYqMSSA@mail.gmail.com> <SJ0PR03MB659860A0D413F409AC784B66CA4B2@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAGxbZ4n3wcAp0DrGSUVeXFMCp0Ha2a+TGjHJuhZ4xoLrQjybLw@mail.gmail.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598AD8C59E4B918D90553B0CA4B2@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR03MB6598AD8C59E4B918D90553B0CA4B2@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Winston Sung <winston21.sung@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:21:06 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGxbZ4n6kuVrqOVQ9Ytqijez2F46p_CzEstQ66CXQPX117sxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-languages@iana.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000474a8806110054dc"
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Gt5RR25C c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65c709d1 a=Z2iVbzAMQWfC12katpY7Eg==:117 a=Z2iVbzAMQWfC12katpY7Eg==:17 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=k7vzHIieQBIA:10 a=5KLPUuaC_9wA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=3mY48d3TFmsA:10 a=DVBJTwuRyChaCscS7HYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=h_DV-Bv1rbwyw_dnnhYA:9 a=5MEUfAtlXWuPI4s-:21 a=Uz9EnhuHEG25YKoRyM-d:22
X-SOURCE-IP: 192.0.46.73
X-SPF-STATUS: soft_fail
X-SPF-FROM-STATUS: not_checked
X-RDNS-STATUS: pass
X-HELO-STRING: pechora3.dc.icann.org
X-DMARC-STATUS: pass
Authentication-Results: east.smtp.mx.icann.org; iprev=pass ip=192.0.46.73; spf=soft_fail client-ip=192.0.46.73 smtp.mailfrom=winston21.sung@gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
Spam-Stopper-Id: ce2a15bc-5945-49f1-9489-9fb1f54d9db5
Spam-Stopper-v2: Yes
X-Envelope-Mail-From: winston21.sung@gmail.com
X-Spam-Category: None
X-AES-Category: LEGIT
X-AES-Processing-Results: 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
X-Spam-Reasons: None
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/ZWfXFxay_0z6J1NPHod5XhJkrT8>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Proposal for variant language subtags for Pe̍h-ōe-jī romanization for Minnan (nan)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 \(RFC 4646\)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 05:29:55 -0000

Apologies about the confusion.

I reconfirmed and found out Tibetan Pinyin is not a transliteration system
but a homophonic translation system. [Regulation of Phonetic Transcription
in Hanyu Pinyin Letters of Place Names in Minority Nationality Languages]

So which solution would be better?
* Propose a single subtag for "vernacular orthography" and include all of
initially used and adopted languages; or,
* Propose different subtags for different vernacular orthography/ies in
different languages?

Should we make some comparisons for vernacular orthography/ies in different
languages with IPA?

Best regards,
SUNG C. C. (Winston Sung)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email