Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 23 April 2019 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FCF120457 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7pXwSHYj6sp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2178812046D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3NFbSA4002691; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:38:14 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=UxsT1ZCDEd76Ds95JoebcyNMlTIzb3us5gh1/u3IIko=; b=BvEaTsZ4VzUayQoC0gKh7Qrou5DkKAjLaCQMwBtTvR6ZFQXwcaGETtqOJQUk9t/ugerC O4fOsv6011yWwn6H1E4hfSyhOiixSljaK7eQSGFpzzOn3Zbt26D8m+3tNeXVAg5IwMRa WQOkjgDZWVm12HlReKOEWUSmvkt3D5HODDsuYJNWNTgbQVB5EcCMv/ZZqoQEidda8J5m vpnDqwEP0mEffkIGUrIJ/uQ5dcqoX2WgQ/WADo14abdxsrIpWe78x8x9KnkZrbEqeeN+ 7P0OvmCWviFQK2NUcVdfG6a9qhokxI3ROsDXkSSNN5p0+RwiuIu2ryT19mVo+n8GM8KW yQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s22fk8r98-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:38:13 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3NFWL9k006450; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:38:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ryxrvcek1-3 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:38:12 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:37:59 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:37:59 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Thread-Topic: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Thread-Index: AQHU68oX0S9GpVs0JEuus0xp6xPoZKZA1NwAgAAG6ICAAajcgIAACNUAgAF47oCABWu7AIAAFJ0AgACHgIA=
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:37:57 +0000
Message-ID: <AD6D8BB5-2965-4623-A2CB-2695BE1C7225@akamai.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk> <C7274EAB-7DDC-491F-9DD2-0CFFADB13CA9@cooperw.in> <72f00d0b-7ec6-ba6a-b17b-97879d457ae3@comcast.net> <CAKKJt-fOMMdM-mkbJaYpsH6XPCpatUkwZY-d_A+MaNa3nhaNDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.18.0.190414
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.161]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AD6D8BB529654623A2CB2695BE1C7225akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-23_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904230105
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-23_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904230106
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-kYONKwPbTZhFOELZaRn_WMLuQc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:39:42 -0000

  *   Instead, I'd like to propose that we move to an expulsion model for the IAB and IESG where the members of the organizations are able to remove a member under certain circumstances:  Behavior inconsistent with a fiduciary (e.g. acting for your company or contracting entity to the detriment of the standards process); behavior that adversely affects the standardization process (IESG) or behavior that adversely affects the general operation of the IAB (e.g. things like harassment); abandonment of the position or  lack of communication from the member.

This and Ekr’s note on anonymous signers (verified by paid staff) seems like the first original thoughts on this thread (as opposed to tweaking the dials to get RTT’s down. :)