Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hello,
At 08:32 PM 22-04-2019, Michael StJohns wrote:
>Instead, I'd like to propose that we move to an expulsion model for 
>the IAB and IESG where the members of the organizations are able to 
>remove a member under certain circumstances:  Behavior inconsistent 
>with a fiduciary (e.g. acting for your company or contracting entity 
>to the detriment of the standards process); behavior that adversely 
>affects the standardization process (IESG) or behavior that 
>adversely affects the general operation of the IAB (e.g. things like 
>harassment); abandonment of the position or  lack of communication 
>from the member.

There is the following in Section 2.2:

    The "nomcom qualified" requirement for a recall petition is contrary
    to the spirit and one of the goals of the Internet Standards Process
    [RFC2026] about procedures which are intended to be fair.

Would the decision of an Area Director/IESG not to sponsor the draft 
be considered as behaviour that adversely affect the standardization process?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy