Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

[Michael StJohns <[e-mail]>]

On 4/18/2019 12:31 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for this email, Alissa. It's interesting. I presume it means that the IESG is unanimous, because it only takes one AD to AD sponsor a draft.
> I asked the IESG. I did not get responses from everyone, but of the people who did respond none of them volunteered to AD-sponsor.


In the past, what's worked for dealing with small things is the 
formation of a design team to look at the problem and figure out if 
there's a document or two to be had.  Perhaps that's a better approach 
than WG forming BOFs or even trying to find a sponsor for this one 
little piece of the problem?

Asa general model, people leave "elected" positions due to term 
expiration, resignation, expulsion (not IETF), recall, death, or 
disability (partial IETF - self-reporting yes as a resignation, 
non-self-reporting no).   It may make sense to fill out the full score 
card while we're updating the recall process.

Later, Mike