IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Aaron Falk <aafalk@akamai.com> Wed, 17 April 2019 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aafalk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED90412002E; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iHSwYeGbZgrs; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3ED312000E; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3HHIWeh008594; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:23:43 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=jan2016.eng; bh=hXkf2QROqmya8doOGiNpiQ8f33ZfhQoAMh3J4Z+k6oo=; b=RUFR62JAm/BCwY524PMAzoYORKYx0+f2dFiZy2/Dw73Wix9j8oUmgzaT9BosU1CLyRCM pclFkPFCFEjT6hPmv0q8V2zdjxbi/JYyvY82Z7dKOX9fMYOC1FstAKzScKq1jQd0z1NS SvgE/VwS5OeHiPXaeHQW5lsTFqs/jZX8zgfRBwtbUOwxilWcBaiCCnxrTOEcnsnLZ6Zj a49fDFO7w2kzCdN2cmYLFGa+bBtk5Zxvhg6igWxifekrcl20jNL9a5NFZVMofiZIOGkn ZvTEmCcef8hFNouIMa3x9U4RP4Ns5pprIEzUZVJpesT0Acwn6wKxK9NAyv9y9iRGjOuF Qg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rx0bwsvcb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:23:43 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3HHMP5D000384; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:23:43 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2rub3vk7w2-6 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:23:42 -0400
Received: from [172.19.33.81] (172.19.33.81) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:22:32 -0700
From: Aaron Falk <aafalk@akamai.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:22:31 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <BB40F115-46E8-4EF3-ABDE-15ABB33B4ACA@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_5EF91309-D894-423D-B6E9-435F474BBC78_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.19.33.81]
X-ClientProxiedBy: usma1ex-cas4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.57) To ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.107)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-17_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=8 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=664 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904170116
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-17_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=8 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=667 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904170116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oIMOTcJc1CPAXoVtFGDL2Q-_FZ0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:24:05 -0000

On 17 Apr 2019, at 11:10, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Can I suggest:
> ...
> - A virtual/interim BoF be held in (say) four weeks from now.

What a cool and (now that you’ve stated it) obvious idea!  Has it been 
done before?

--aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email