IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF54312014E; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=39d1ZLuT; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=w7BhmQdX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_tjc43NRRg6; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2624112014A; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.53.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x3OL9I1R026710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1556140171; x=1556226571; bh=6ZjgnIYSFxJ4rcKSyq6De4A8ZuEhDHasbnkfEbeZjsU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=39d1ZLuT3XpmY93Rnmo2OvAUfUNS5dDgTq3/RkcbAGuageuU9YeqfZ0xL6LLEavCu cS61lA59qYiWmL8V1NidJXtuYpyyn5nb3uy+8j2kaCjMh9XNrRSzPLSYqSnUfnbAnb DNjgjVXPnrfI8U4l5P7Z/yfW6dlqOO51yVW+yANY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1556140171; x=1556226571; i=@elandsys.com; bh=6ZjgnIYSFxJ4rcKSyq6De4A8ZuEhDHasbnkfEbeZjsU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=w7BhmQdXDXZULyZl428Z8blxqxzBJ9ye5t/vAw83wWKm/LNHqIC74BHY5Pf6iytRI i2zgWU/f6/1LPrLX5pMuYd59eHJfxZcLLL5SrzyuomItzMzTP4eQgCRtLyWjOmSnOt gs3X3NjNjyyYaXiGNxVui9ROIDV+/GxiFxuDC1j8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190424134823.0c9faf68@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:08:18 -0700
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, gen-ads@ietf.org, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk> <C7274EAB-7DDC-491F-9DD2-0CFFADB13CA9@cooperw.in> <72f00d0b-7ec6-ba6a-b17b-97879d457ae3@comcast.net> <CAKKJt-fOMMdM-mkbJaYpsH6XPCpatUkwZY-d_A+MaNa3nhaNDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424095017.13cdadc8@elandnews.com> <51068F13-E90F-42A2-8AE2-627D5E18B145@akamai.com> <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/drsYBKjH9Uepzd1ExLjSZ-RJskA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:09:36 -0000

Hi Nico, Rich,
At 01:19 PM 24-04-2019, Nico Williams wrote:
>+1.  AD decisions to not sponsor a draft are really not the sort of
>decisions that can be appealed.  You've got two ADs per-area, if you
>can't get either of them, or any of the others, to sponsor your draft,
>then maybe you're doing things wrong.  A BoF/WG seems like a fine
>starting point.

I added a Cc to the Area Director as it is useful to know whether the 
decision can be appealed or not.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email