Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 11:20 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DFD3A09D5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 04:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NIhm4JdXP8Gu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 04:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3643A0C25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 04:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1594466436; x=1595676036; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=3SCgLeYSd97tQBIzESbC+RKAU3+B0KT1JYBA0jxfAAI=; b=G6Qegd6fatn0ehfQDXKis4pd5ROswYOLn+0o1CY9gCbD1oMndVpSDH3Q 1RNHSXVSgvduM0+u46aYuoawJ1adD8CLm32cdPYdiSPx4HB4Nb72xeQVO QvddNa3dhHU4QHPX1kLNUV1E2kq6tsfOhvgLr8xmj9RACraPPp83+gU+S Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BcBADLnwlf/xbLJq1gHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGCCoNtASAShF+JAYdylBeGLoFpCwEBAQwBAS8EAQGETAKCFyU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FZ4VwBiNWEAsEKRUCAlcGgzmCfacXdoEyE4U+hRaBOI0LggCBOAwQgk0+gQSCcoEGglczgi0EjwgGpg6CZ4MGk3KCYAMekGo8jgStDoNSAgQGBQIVgWojgVczGggbFTsqAYI/PRIZDY42H44SPwNnAgYBBwEBAwmPdwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.75,339,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="27759911"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Jul 2020 11:20:32 +0000
Received: from [10.61.217.131] ([10.61.217.131]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06BBKVVR028779 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:20:31 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <D01B78A3-28F0-4559-A834-D6BC5AE6336B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B11BE59E-C1ED-409A-85B6-DE624C3326C3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:20:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <30972D6C-F7EC-4228-A736-2489CE04530B@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, The IETF List <ietf@ietf.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <1112046E-04ED-4DB1-8766-4928AC5D15F5@akamai.com> <20200711002800.GC49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <17D66D97-9F29-470C-83CA-53C48F49D323@strayalpha.com> <20200711011915.GE49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <30972D6C-F7EC-4228-A736-2489CE04530B@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.217.131, [10.61.217.131]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0OenyjpCCC-cfoXsZOhTB0DhnSw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:20:38 -0000
Joe, Toerless, Mike: Yoav may be correct about the letter of the rule, but Mike is certainly correct about the spirit. Specifically: The RFC does not take into account all possible failure or exception scenarios. The chair is expected to adhere to the spirit of the process when the letter fails us. This may be one of those cases. The chair should avoid using discretion or influencing in any way the selection of specific individuals. That is why we produce an ordered list of randomly selected individuals from a pool. As a corollary corporate affiliation should only play a role in removals and not on additions. There should be no room for selective substitution on the part of the chair in this process. Eliot Full disclosure: I work for a company that would generally be viewed as a competitor to Huawei and affiliates. That same company could be viewed as a reason we have these sorts of limits on NOMCOM participation, so take this for what it’s worth.
- Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random select… NomCom Chair 2020
- Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Resu… Michael StJohns
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Salz, Rich
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Mary B
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Kyle Rose
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … John C Klensin
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Samuel Weiler
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Martin Duke
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Michael StJohns
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Joseph Touch
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Joseph Touch
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Melinda Shore
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Joseph Touch
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Eliot Lear
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Michael StJohns
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Yoav Nir
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Rob Sayre
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Mike StJohns
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Victor Kuarsingh
- RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Eliot Lear
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Michael StJohns
- RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Michael StJohns
- Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom … Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Mike StJohns
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… John C Klensin
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Rob Sayre
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… John C Klensin
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… S Moonesamy
- RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: … Mehmet Ersue
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Samuel Weiler
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… S Moonesamy
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Victor Kuarsingh
- RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… STARK, BARBARA H
- Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Chal… Samuel Weiler
- Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nom… Warren Kumari
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Mary B
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Pete Resnick
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Samuel Weiler
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Pete Resnick
- RE: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: … Randy Bush
- Re: Additional advisors Brian E Carpenter