IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4C93A0BF3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThL4jGaHgyqr; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35663A0BDD; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id z13so8199222wrw.5; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=eK9N6F79EHQotVbwXknGugrrt9DhkBec5t8wLNuzxR4=; b=XQjHnsDJ37223+ffKV3wSLoXCBL65mQ6yq7BCYmIZqnZrapOEXtNxpPDhjBm0ibWNw THxzQWEl9vsXUPLHc6larEJyeAx03Z8rhRpekkA3yHuFgFbRE8XNoHGbeufD+ZHtBM9d kHUq1HUVmnH8x1nCyRCNzAfnxjWFw1rNxFimhKwGrMWGXMioWAbYXAibOuARrwZc6xUl QiTJmFFwIQ073XPTDqG14y6WPxKubCsRM9ERfaDstZABe0Gt9iBql5nMivwqQxUct8xO yT2m/rDlh/MHW8uOHHPt6sEuBka+C0v+KYEtRk/VOPvlrQNdlKpYPuJfxzUSQjaXp8cG zcmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=eK9N6F79EHQotVbwXknGugrrt9DhkBec5t8wLNuzxR4=; b=sXLcgfrXHxW97mQt7VX2+pA0WO1eWp8PvsqWIlKH/Khn8Pm6zviNNqKl9fQOgdmAZr qLyDgpzUfcAmnqXBeyddWZ9Qlktsa0nJzOifQ59Pp8uKN7Xlhct0cTPepD890VadWCK4 LDuuQkoJhhsE/k6fkgd7s8wufgUcgs+aRirgwutu0V5aIuy5aB9GfG0Fq11CzZHvFm8j nhhYYwFyxc2OphRozViS1KHot5acHvA30BOWlwrh8uUZZ4jxjEabeQpjd9VU0qLKqqD+ ZDC++Iv1Cxrs7yhBV5yG9SlU0YC1Uk0CB19/QgZyU/3PbhUrnw4r35ipNkVLDuCC+S3X 7cZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iH9/etiOyZhjYf1jIIQqGC/9isle8ipRxfpBnPsbnfni3ZGb4 pFu2DtR4miWYmwlXl3aqryM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwx5hnQ4B+KpkE22n8H6iHOnaWbmQHfW9a9vjGFm8WDrg3CTePPYE2/m8EXAmmcqjPmRyfn3g==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5651:: with SMTP id j17mr68421906wrw.145.1594461060425; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm13089591wme.23.2020.07.11.02.50.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <EA1BCB3A-5473-4C14-92FF-B38713132D2C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B402BEFA-983B-4AF8-A190-B0EEC3712867"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:50:57 +0300
In-Reply-To: <c3de3ced-2995-dba2-6bf6-89d0659138be@comcast.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, NomCom Chair 2020 <nomcom-chair-2020@ietf.org>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <892C3021-1B44-463C-B2C4-5070396EFD50@gmail.com> <c3de3ced-2995-dba2-6bf6-89d0659138be@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VwsgnyyT3sudOvGfLC4esn73YJg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:51:03 -0000


> On 11 Jul 2020, at 1:58, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> If Luigi declines to take the position, "the chair must repeat the random selection process" or work with 9 members.   In general, that's meant continuing down the list, not going back and picking up someone who was already not selected.  

As others noted, that if for the period after the seating of the nomcom. 
> 
>> I believe she has made such a determination, and has acted within the mandate of RFC 7437.
> Luigi indicating he works for Huawei restructures the list and eliminates Tal.  Luigi indicating he won't serve triggers 5.7.  These are two separate events.
> 
> This is not ambiguous.
> 
> 
I disagree.

You cannot un-emit data. Once the NomCom chair has send the message with the list of NomCom members, they are the presumptive NomCom and all changes and challenges must be based on that list. What you are suggesting is to turn back the clock to re-run the process as if that message had never been sent.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email