IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982463A0B8D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qudBx3X3t1pC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D033A0B90 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id z13so8189368wrw.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5+0Iz1kjYtg30VN/JNP1oP8IEqvhPHJGWKr5OHGH5lw=; b=Pyq87s/cTKDP9r73cjehvHTT0itCum3hXSDE9Ww0L58i8IoNGP8xJ0rROTSXdTiqUW yuPT2xiE+XYEZREfqPBBD0PMdkmZvy7aglnO6yib5yS+lC2PNCvVR3vcjjRRn96yoBD3 549sNvYObmj2L9m42/qxxHqpCRjwSBLQys8vHVDdnA3pyCz7E9CgZjosJkjMoK09WGSW 6aEZABrc9ysJrNIuq63l/e/W+N1YjcXGEvQqf7aOptK35dVV24IZ3xNOiYxYiYQbyjnB +GyYdFOZi8QHDG0lppHAq+sTUKzt9xdPm51el8LDSGA3a8Hh4sPn1dM9tEpz81AhX2De POkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5+0Iz1kjYtg30VN/JNP1oP8IEqvhPHJGWKr5OHGH5lw=; b=JPJ2MpG80oo9oPgtW9HTC+PVGdVIIPhUwKbiDMnBE+Ts490r5z7LFwYQVSm8CZTRQj aqegrEWQT8Saghl4HgdKISRzI+WhYFaF0GdrJipqVIjNg2KT58G4Xn34o1o2ynC7TZU8 Jywprjn32KXO/Hxcvmwm4FZyGap/jUsV79h4r/S73b3lkUIQPN2Ze5Vdq9gghyMb/ClU c2/bT08xbMoV5r0hEjFAoZ+tq8S6g593dg/MB14U2FDQ5M3ESt+wcKJPGGe99LjprSIn 3XaCQlleFK1D2FD8L7gMJBhVhGhcqJPGbQQTQ7sP/OQ2SljR5q4rDRx2WM1pmgNPnBKw dFtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530F7xJDjNETITluOX2FisCP/lkVh29J5uHMtJYMy060BTeaixSx MKY2NAGz33M1WLZplXLDnMvB2vQo
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3KNNXWl1zcL2FP01SzbxwNOircFCGy9nbRb7MofwDlFg1FwdXXfSW6oIGFuKYfTptcZuu1w==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:8342:: with SMTP id 60mr21653251wrd.62.1594460651798; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b62sm12962500wmh.38.2020.07.11.02.44.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C0FB1D7E-4E11-4940-BE09-B4921164EC2F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_146BE3F6-2329-47E1-8270-D20DF32C790A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:44:08 +0300
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.23.453.2007101640160.33508@samuels-air>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler@csail.mit.edu>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <2085D0ED888C7E7E50DCE8B4@PSB> <alpine.OSX.2.23.453.2007101640160.33508@samuels-air>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AcyywRCeso1EvOc_G-ALjnxV0O4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:44:15 -0000


> On 10 Jul 2020, at 23:47, Samuel Weiler <weiler@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
>> ... I'm also
>> not sure they are clear about what is supposed to happen, if the
>> Nomcom were to get well into the interview stage or beyond and a
>> voting member were to switch affiliations to a company that
>> already had two seats.
> 
> That part, at least, is clear.  End of section 5.7:
> 
>   A change in the primary affiliation of a voting volunteer during
>   the term of the NomCom is not a cause to request the recall of
>   that volunteer, even if the change would result in more than two
>   voting volunteers with the same affiliation.
> 
> To the matter at hand, though, I like Yoav's analysis. [1]  Let's let the Nomcom get to work.
> 
> -- Sam
> 
> 
> [1] Though he should be citing RFC8713, not 7437.  :-)
> 

Whoops. In my defense, the tools version of RFC 8713 [1] says that it obsoletes 7437, but the tools version of 7437 [2] does not say that it is obsoleted by 8713.

Yoav

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8713 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8713>
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7437 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7437>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email